How Far Are Stars? Calculating Distance to Earth

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ElectroBurger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on methods for calculating the distance between Earth and stars, exploring various techniques applicable to different distances, including stellar parallax, Cepheid variables, and redshift. The scope includes theoretical explanations and practical applications in astronomy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe stellar parallax as a method for measuring the distance to nearby stars by observing their apparent movement against distant backgrounds over a six-month period.
  • Others mention that for more distant stars, techniques such as comparing brightness of stars with known absolute brightness and using Cepheid variables are employed.
  • A participant raises the question of using redshift to estimate distances to faraway galaxies, prompting a discussion on various techniques for measuring distances as objects get further away.
  • There is a claim that stellar parallax is currently effective up to about 1,500 light years, with potential future expansions to around 10,000 light years.
  • One participant expresses curiosity about the implications of the universe's expansion on distance measurements, questioning if distances change over time and if repeated measurements could reveal the rate of expansion.
  • Another participant counters that local distances are stable due to gravitational binding within galaxies, although they acknowledge slight changes due to galactic rotation.
  • Participants discuss the definition of a parsec, explaining it as the distance at which stellar parallax is one arc-second, equating to approximately 3.262 light years.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the methods of measuring distances to stars but express differing views on the implications of the universe's expansion and the stability of those distances over time. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the impact of cosmic expansion on local measurements.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the constancy of certain measurements and the dependence on definitions of astronomical units. There are unresolved aspects regarding the effects of cosmic expansion on distance measurements over time.

ElectroBurger
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
How do people calculate the distnce between Earth and a star?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hold out your finger at arms length
Now close one eye
Open it and close the other eye instead
You can see the finger appear to move against what's behind it.
If you measure the angle between the finger and some background mark and know the distance between your eyes you can work out the distance to your finger

In the case of stars you make measurements 6 months apart and use the Earth's movement around the sun for the baseline. This let's you measure the nearest stars very accurately. It's called stellar parallax.

Then for more distant stars we use the fact that 2 stars with the same real (absolute) brightness will appear different (apparent) brightnesses if they are at different distances. We use this to find the distances to more distant stars by comparing their brightness to the ones we measured close to us.
 
Hi Mgb-phys, can we use redshift index to estimate the distance of far away galaxies?
 
There are a whole series of techniques as you get further away.
So beyond the techniques above for stars you can use Cepheid variables to give you the distance to nearby galaxies, then type I supernova, and then finally cosmological redshift for the most distant objects.
 
Expanding on what mgb_phys said, the method of stellar parallax currently works out to a distance of approximately 1,500ly. This, however, will be expanded within several years to around 10,000ly. Stellar parallax is really the only "direct" method that we have of measuring distances to star in so far as it relies solely on the assumptions of geometry. Everything else is based on inference.

As mgb_phys said anything else relies on the principle that there are objects in our universe which are esentially the same (put out the same amount of light), so by measuring how much we receive, we can compute the distance to the object.
 
Thank you all for the help,

I've never thought of using parallax to find distant stars. I suppose that it's quite easy to calculate distance once we know the way we travel through space.

But wouldn't these distances between us and the stars change since the universe is expanding?

Making several measurements to the same star over time would tell us the rate of accelerated expansion of the universe, correct?
 
ElectroBurger said:
But wouldn't these distances between us and the stars change since the universe is expanding?
No the galaxy (and the local cluster of galaxies) is held together by gravity.
The distance to nearby stars does change slightly as the galaxy rotates, each star is moving in a slightly different orbit and affected by the motion of other nearby stars.

Making several measurements to the same star over time would tell us the rate of accelerated expansion of the universe, correct?
Not on the timescales we live for!
You can measure the expansion rate from measuring the speed and distance to very distant objects. It's possible to measure the speed directly from the redshift of the spectral lines.
 
Nearby stars can be distanced based on parallax - the measured difference between their position relative to distant stars and the position of Earth at six month intervals. This kind of measurement is accurate for any star within about 20 light years of earth. Indirect methods must be used at greater distances.
 
Chronos said:
This kind of measurement is accurate for any star within about 20 light years of earth.
The Hipparchos mission pushed that out to around 200pc ( 650ly) for high accuracy results and further for the 10-20% accuracy measurements.
 
  • #10
you used the measurment of a parsec, exactly how is that defined? I know that a light year is not an SI unit, and the au is, but is the pc?
 
  • #11
ElectroBurger said:
you used the measurment of a parsec, exactly how is that defined? I know that a light year is not an SI unit, and the au is, but is the pc?

Parsec is short for "parallax second" it is the distance at which the stellar parallax would be 1 arc-second (an arc second is 1/3600 of a degree). It is equal to 3.262 light years.
 
  • #12
Astronomers don't like writing down long number so make up their own units.

If the base of the triangle is one au (the Earth sun distance) and the angle of the star is one arc-sec (about the smallest angle you can see through a blurry atmosphere) then the distance is one parsec. The nearest star is around 1.2parsec
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K