How Far Back Can We See with Better Optics?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for observing distant galaxies and cosmic phenomena at high redshifts (Z), particularly focusing on how advancements in optical technology might extend our observational capabilities. Participants explore the limits of current telescopes and speculate on the implications for understanding the early universe, including the formation of galaxies and stars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how far back we can see with improved optics, specifically regarding galaxies at redshift Z=11.1 and beyond.
  • One participant suggests that with better optics, we might observe back to the initial creation of photons.
  • Another participant proposes that we could see back to the formation of the first galaxies and proto-galaxies, but emphasizes that redshift estimates are uncertain due to insufficient data.
  • It is noted that the Hubble Space Telescope cannot detect the first galaxies due to their redshift being beyond its frequency range, while the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is designed for this purpose.
  • Some participants mention that the JWST is expected to detect galaxies up to redshift Z~15, but earlier galaxies may not be observable due to the absence of galaxies at that time, according to current knowledge.
  • There is a discussion about the first stars potentially forming before the first galaxies, with estimates around Z~20, but these stars are considered optically undetectable at such distances.
  • A participant provides a back-of-the-envelope calculation regarding the apparent brightness of early stars and the limitations of current and upcoming telescopes, indicating that even with advancements, some targets may remain out of reach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the limits of observation with better optics, with some agreeing on the potential of the JWST while others highlight the uncertainties and limitations regarding the detection of early cosmic structures. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact limits of visibility and the implications of redshift estimates.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that redshift estimates are based on limited data, and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the calculations presented. The discussion also highlights the dependence on technological advancements and the definitions of observable phenomena.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
Here is a galaxy at very high Z, i thought that Z=7 was a limit before re ionization, so how much further back will we see with better optics ?
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.00461.pdf
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Right back to the initial creation of photons.
 
Hi Simon, perhaps i should have asked the question in a different way, How far back will we be able to see galaxies Z-11.1 seems a long way to me.
 
Maybe back to the formation of the first galaxies and proto-galaxies ... I think the visible horizon is farther away than that in this epoch.
However, you should understand that these redshifts are estimates - there is not enough data to pin them down.
 
Thank you for the clarification SB.
 
And it is not expected to see earlier galaxies simply because there were no galaxies (to our current knowledge).

Some individual stars formed earlier according to the linked page, but detecting those would need a telescope orders of magnitude better.
 
Yes, the first stars are believed to predate the first galaxies by a considerable margin - probably around z~20 - ,but, Individual stars are deemed to be to be optically undetectable at such vast distances. They are already difficult enough to resolve with existing telescopes in even our nearest neighboring galaxies.
 
  • #10
A back of the envelope calculation:
Typical properties (page 7) -> the higher temperatur cancels a redshift factor of ~18, so their spectrum is not that far away from a solar spectrum. The sun has an absolute magnitude of ~5, 1 million times this luminosity (worst case) would give them an apparent magnitude of -10.
Cosmology calc -> z=20 gives a luminous distance of 230 GPc, or a difference of apparent and absolute magnitude of 57. Combining both, we get an apparent brightness of 47mag. With the upper value for their luminosity, this improves to 40mag.
The limiting magnitude for E-ELT (under construction) is around 36mag, still out of reach even with perfect conditions. Well, at least we don't need planet-sized telescopes...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K