Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How is it then when you colide 2 protons

  1. Feb 25, 2010 #1
    if a proton is a particle itself how is it then when you colide 2 protons in hte large hadron colider you find a bunch of different particles?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 25, 2010 #2
    Re: protons

    because the number of particles is not conserved.
     
  4. Feb 25, 2010 #3
    Re: protons

    ok well that didnt help me at all. what does that even meen im no genious
     
  5. Feb 25, 2010 #4
    Re: protons

    then explain what exactly you see strange in "you find a bunch of different particles"
     
  6. Feb 25, 2010 #5

    SpectraCat

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Re: protons

    Your statement indicates that you think a particle is a discrete object. A rock is also a discrete object .. but when you bang two rocks together, you can break them into smaller rocks if you hit them hard enough.
     
  7. Feb 25, 2010 #6
    Re: protons

    It just means that the number of particles does not have to stay the same. Although particle number is often conserved in a non-relativistic system (not enough energy to break particles apart or create pairs of particles), it definitely is not conserved in a high energy collision at the LHC. This is unlike energy, which is conserved, so the total energy is the same before and after a collision.

    Edit: Man, I'm slow! Two replies while I was typing this up.
     
  8. Feb 25, 2010 #7
    Re: protons

    ok that helps a little more but ill try to explaine my question a bit better.

    if protons are made up of 3 quarks how do all the other particles fit into the proton.
    you can fit a boulder into pea. thats kinda what im getting at
     
  9. Feb 25, 2010 #8
    Re: protons

    they dont fit
    you think about the collision as protons are breaking into smaller parts, previously existed inside them. this is incorrect

    They are transformed into other particles.

    For example, neutron can decay

    n -> p + e- + neutrino

    but at the same time, an opposite reaction is possible in some conditions

    p -> n + e+ + (anti)neutrino

    so if you try to think using your logic, proton consists of neutron and something, while neutron consists of proton and something :)
     
  10. Feb 25, 2010 #9
    Re: protons

    that makes ALOT more sence thank you but how can they transform into other particles? and could you explain the math that you just showed im really bad and stll trying to learn the math
     
  11. Feb 25, 2010 #10

    SpectraCat

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Re: protons

    The words "boulder" and "pea" have definite implications about relative size .. what about the words "proton" and "quark" makes you think there are any similar size implications? Anyway, even if there *were* relative size implications .. the strong nuclear force is .. STRONG! Ever see a snake in a can trick? The snake is way bigger than the can, but you can still compress it and stuff it inside the can. So you could visualize the 3 quarks as being "stuffed inside" the protons, and the collision releases them (I am not saying this is physically correct .. it is just an analogy to help you visualize the situation).
     
  12. Feb 25, 2010 #11
    Re: protons

    In QM *all* kinds of reactions are possible
    *unless* they are violate some laws.
    So in QM it is more logical to ask "why this reaction is not possible" then "why that reaction is possible"
     
  13. Feb 25, 2010 #12
    Re: protons

    ok so is it the heat created by colliding protons that forms other particels?
     
  14. Feb 25, 2010 #13
    Re: protons

    so when 2 protons colide it basicly melts down for a very breif second and form the other particles? do these other particles also have there own set of quarks?
     
  15. Feb 25, 2010 #14
    Re: protons

    Well, quarks collide independently.
    It is easier to analyze the collision of 2 electrons, because they are structure-less.
    You also can get a bunch of new particles.
     
  16. Feb 25, 2010 #15
    Re: protons

    ok do they ever colide nuetrons?
     
  17. Feb 25, 2010 #16
    Re: protons

    you are asking if electron can collide neutron?

    take any reaction I wrote above, for example:

    n -> p + (e-) + (anti-v)

    move electron to the right part as if it was a variable. You get:

    n + (e+) -> p + (anti-v)

    note that electron must be very energetic to 'feel' individual quarks in normally neutral neutron.
     
  18. Feb 25, 2010 #17
    Re: protons

    can someone tell me what every thing stands for in that math?
     
  19. Feb 25, 2010 #18

    SpectraCat

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Re: protons

    Neutrons are harder because they are not charged particles, therefore it is very difficult to control their trajectories. I suspect neutron-neutron collisions have been recorded as secondary events, but I don't actually know if they have been able to "break apart" neutrons in such a fashion. Most of the information comes from proton-neutron collisions, where a slow-moving thermal neutron is impacted by a relativistic proton.
     
  20. Feb 25, 2010 #19
    Re: protons

    n neutron
    p proton
    e- electron
    e+ positron
    v - neutrino
     
  21. Feb 25, 2010 #20

    Matterwave

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Re: protons

    As one of my professors once put it, "In regular life, if you collide two cars together, you get 2 mashed up cars, but in QM you can collide two cars together and get out a goat..." (I'm paraphrasing here)

    It's weird like that. As long as the energy, charge, lepton number, etc, are conserved.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook