How is the Variance in Particle Number Derived?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cryptist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Variance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The variance in particle number, denoted as \(\langle (\Delta N)^2 \rangle\), is derived using the Fermi-Dirac distribution and the grand-canonical partition function. The mean particle number \(\langle N \rangle\) is expressed as \(\langle N \rangle = k_B T \frac{1}{Z} \frac{dZ}{d \mu}\), where \(Z\) is the grand-canonical partition function. The second moment \(\langle N^2 \rangle\) is similarly derived as \(\langle N^2 \rangle = (k_B T)^2 \frac{1}{Z} \frac{d^2 Z}{d \mu^2}\). These equations are valid under constant volume and temperature conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Knowledge of grand-canonical partition function
  • Familiarity with Gibbs factors and their significance
  • Basic concepts of statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Fermi-Dirac distribution in detail
  • Learn about the grand-canonical ensemble and its applications
  • Explore the concept of Gibbs factors in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of variance in quantum statistical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, statisticians, and researchers in quantum mechanics or statistical mechanics who are interested in the behavior of particle systems and their statistical properties.

cryptist
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
I saw an equation on wikipedia: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi-Dirac_statistics)

b17305ed57f454a2e9b8a2ef47dd3f82.png


Does anybody know how this is derived?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Express the mean partice number in therms of the grandcanonical partition function.
 
\langle N \rangle is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, which is derived on that wikipedia page. So, you can perform the derivative yourself and verify the second equality.

The first equality can be derived as follows. First,

\displaystyle \langle ( \Delta N )^2 \rangle = \langle (N - \langle N \rangle )^2 \rangle = \langle N^2 - 2 \langle N \rangle N + \langle N \rangle^2 \rangle = \langle N^2 \rangle - \langle N \rangle^2.

Next, at constant volume and temperature, the grand-canonical partition function is given as the sum over all states, s of the Gibbs factors, e^{- (e_s - \mu n_s ) / k_B T} (check out the wikipedia page on partition function if this is unfamiliar):

\displaystyle Z = \sum_s e^{- (e_s - \mu n_s )/ k_B T}.

Here e_s and n_s are the state energy and occupation number. The Gibbs factor of a state measures the relative probability that that state is occupied. Hence, by definition,

\displaystyle \langle N \rangle = \frac{\sum_s n_s e^{-(e_s - \mu n_s)/k_B T}}{\sum_s e^{- (e_s - \mu n_s ) / k_B T}}.

Given these formulas for Z and \langle N \rangle, you should be able to show that

\displaystyle \langle N \rangle = k_B T \frac{1}{Z} \frac{dZ}{d \mu}.

I've taken it for granted that the derivatives are taken at constant volume and temperature.

Analogously, show that

\displaystyle \langle N^2 \rangle = (k_B T)^2 \frac{1}{Z} \frac{d^2 Z}{d \mu^2}.

Okay. At this point, I think you have all of the formulas you need to derive the first equality that you quoted from wikipedia. Just a little bit of ingenuity left. Good luck.
 
Thank you for the answer!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K