How Large Could a Virga-Style Enclosure Be Before Collapsing?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter qraal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical limits of a Virga-style enclosure, as depicted in Karl Schroeder's Virga series, focusing on the physical constraints that would determine its maximum size before gravitational collapse occurs. Participants explore concepts related to hydrostatic equilibrium, the Jeans Mass, and the implications of ideal gas behavior in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the concept of Jeans Mass and the Virial Theorem to analyze the stability of a large air-filled enclosure, suggesting a maximum radius of approximately 34,750 km based on certain assumptions.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption of constant density in an isothermal gas, arguing that hydrostatic equilibrium requires a pressure gradient, which contradicts the assumption of constant density and pressure.
  • A different participant reflects on the stability of gas blobs in relation to Jeans Mass, suggesting that the maximum stable size may occur when the central pressure equals the average pressure, positing that this is a conjecture rather than a definitive proof.
  • One participant asserts that the Jeans Mass represents the boundary between stability and collapse, emphasizing that a constant density sphere cannot be in hydrostatic equilibrium.
  • Another participant calculates a maximum size of 44,000 km for a Virga-style enclosure, noting the immense material requirements for structural integrity and referencing the availability of astrophysical metals for construction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding density and pressure in hydrostatic equilibrium, with no consensus reached on the implications of these assumptions for the stability of the Virga enclosure. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the maximum size and stability conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on assumptions about density and pressure behavior in an ideal gas, as well as the unresolved nature of the relationship between Jeans Mass and stability in the context of the proposed enclosure.

qraal
Messages
789
Reaction score
4
Hello Forumites

In Karl Schroeder's Virga series, the Virga he describes as a vast air-filled space in which various "steam-punk" societies exist. Electronics are artificially stopped from working inside Virga, to preserve a low-tech sample of humanity. In pondering such a construct I wondered just how big it could get before running into physical limits. The most obvious is the Jeans Mass - when the gravitational self-attraction overwhelms sound waves restoring pressure/density perturbations away from equilibrium. The Virial Theorem says an equilibrium system is on the verge of self-collapse when...

2 Kinetic Energy = Ω

...Ω being the gravitational binding energy, in the case of a uniform density ball that's

3/5.G.M2/R

and, by the ideal gas law, the 2.KE = 3.N.k.T, N being the total number of particles. Assuming a constant mix of particles through out, N = M/μ, where M is the total mass and μ is the mean molecular mass. So 2.KE = 3M.(kT/μ) and the mass is 4/3.π.R3.ρ, where ρ is the density.

According to the ideal gas law

P.V = N.k.T

and N = M/μ, and since ρ = M/V, we can derive P/ρ = k.T/μ

which means 2.KE = 3M.P/ρ

For the Virga if we take P and ρ to be their sea-level standards (101,325 Pa and 1.225 kg/m3), that means we can compute

R2 = 15/(4πG).P/ρ2

so Rmax ~ 34,750 km

Here's the thing. The central pressure of a uniform ball, from its gravity alone, is

3/(8π).G.M2/R4

which gives us the central pressure as 253,312 Pa for the figures we just derived. How can that be right? The ratio is 5/2. To compare...

Pc = 6/9.π.G.ρ2.R2 (gravitational central pressure of uniform sphere)

Pj = 4/15.π.G.ρ2.R2 (...call it the Jeans Pressure)

I would think the stable scenario would be when Pc = Pj, but I suspect I am missing something subtle. I have assumed the system is isothermal (i.e. the interior is being heated to match radiative losses from the surface.)

So can anyone explain it to me?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I know that for something to be supported against gravitational collapse (in hydrostatic equilibrium), there has to be a pressure *gradient*, meaning that the pressure increases as you move from the outside to the centre. You have assumed an ideal gas, but you have also assumed a constant density. Problem: the equation of state for an ideal gas says that if T = const, then P ~ ρ, and hence constant ρ ==> constant P. But we just said that P cannot be constant in hydrostatic equilibrium. Conclusion: an isothermal ball of (ideal) gas in hydrostatic equilibrium cannot have a constant density throughout. Could this be the issue?
 
cepheid said:
I know that for something to be supported against gravitational collapse (in hydrostatic equilibrium), there has to be a pressure *gradient*, meaning that the pressure increases as you move from the outside to the centre. You have assumed an ideal gas, but you have also assumed a constant density. Problem: the equation of state for an ideal gas says that if T = const, then P ~ ρ, and hence constant ρ ==> constant P. But we just said that P cannot be constant in hydrostatic equilibrium. Conclusion: an isothermal ball of (ideal) gas in hydrostatic equilibrium cannot have a constant density throughout. Could this be the issue?

I had wondered the same. I think the problem is that I assumed the Jeans Mass is stable - it's not. Numerical simulations (using SPH) of Jeans Mass gas blobs will collapse inexorably, as will slightly sub-Jeans Mass blobs, but at about ~60% Jeans Mass the blobs disperse. Thus I think the maximum stable size is probably when Pc = P(average), so that the speed of sound can dampen out any perturbations from equilibrium. That means M(max) is roughly at (2/5)(3/2) of Mj, but that's a conjecture, not a proof.
 
What simulations show to collapse or not is not very relevant for the question. The idea is that the Jeans mass is indeed the border between stability and collapse.

Cepheid was right: a sphere of gas is not in hydrostatic equilibrium if the density is constant.
 
Putting numbers to my conjecture, that means a Virga style air-enclosure is 44,000 km across, using a standard N2/O2 mix to breathe. That's quite immense - Karl Schroeder settles for just 5,000 km in the books. I had wondered about just how strong the structure had to be to avoid bursting and derived some figures on using gravitational pressure of the enclosure itself to counterbalance the air-pressure - it works, but the material required is immense. Yet assuming we could ramscoop the Sun and sift for metals (astrophysical metals) there's ~20 Jupiter masses, to make stuff, available.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K