How long do we need to wait for Quantum Computers?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the timeline for the practical use of quantum computers and the programming requirements for running classical programs on quantum systems. It touches on theoretical implications, technological advancements, and concerns regarding scientific modeling.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how long it will take for quantum computing to be utilized effectively.
  • Another participant suggests that the wait may be over for specific applications, such as factoring small numbers like 21.
  • A participant mentions D-Wave as a company producing commercially available quantum computers, noting the controversy surrounding its design and operation.
  • It is proposed that classical programs can run on quantum computers, but without any advantage, as they require specially designed algorithms to leverage quantum capabilities.
  • A later reply emphasizes the unpredictability of when a full quantum computer will be available, comparing its development to the early days of classical computers and the need for significant breakthroughs.
  • Some participants speculate that advancements akin to the invention of the transistor could be necessary for practical quantum computing, with estimates suggesting a timeline of a couple of decades.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the current state and future potential of quantum computing, with no consensus on the timeline for practical applications or the effectiveness of existing quantum systems.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of quantum computers and the specific capabilities of existing systems like D-Wave. The timeline for breakthroughs remains uncertain and speculative.

nowhat
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was thinking whether I should put this threat under general physics or engineering... but anyway, here's the problem: how long do we need to wait until quantum computing is put to use?

Also, can programmes that run on classical computers run on quantum computers, or do they need an entirely new programming strategy?

I am quite concerned about the possibility of it being used for scientific modeling (within my years of living lol).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wait is basically over if your research involves factoring 21.

Quantum computers are still in the infancy stage compared to classical computers.
 
There is a company called D-Wave that makes a commercially available quantum computer. I think its development included one of the space technology companies. It works on the adiabetic method, but there is plenty of controversy over its design and operation. I think Google might have one. Anyway check it out.
 
A few things:

The D-wave system is not a full quantum computer per se, it's a special type, and there's a lot of questions regarding exactly what it can do, even theoretically.

And to answer some of the OP's questions. Classical programs can be run on a quantum computer, but it would be pointless as they would not benefit anything from it. In order to benefit from the quantum speed-up special algorithms have to be constructed that utilizes the quantum paralellism of superpositions and entanglement.

The question about when a full quantum computer will be available is almost impossible to answer, because it wil depend on when significant break throuhs are made. Compare for example with the development of classical computers. The early computers made from electron tubes where extremely cumbersome and no one at that time could envision how these would ever be useful to the average person. Then someone figures out the transistor and suddenly all options are open. Quantum computers right now are similarly primitive, but there's just no way of predicting when or even if someone will invent an effective "quantum transitor". Most people guess on a couple of decades or so.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K