MHB How Long Does It Take to Solve the YouTube Puzzle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Participants in the discussion share their experiences solving the YouTube puzzle, with most reporting it took around 15 seconds to find the solution. Some express frustration at the perceived simplicity of the puzzle, suggesting that people often overcomplicate math problems. One user mentions it took them over a minute, highlighting the varying levels of difficulty experienced. The consensus leans towards a quick resolution for most, indicating that the puzzle may not be as challenging as it seems. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the differing perceptions of problem-solving speed.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Screenshot_20200506-161004_YouTube.jpg


Yes I know its insulting

But how many seconds did it take you to see the solution
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'd say a good 15 seconds. :)
 
karush said:
View attachment 9783

Yes I know its insulting

But how many seconds did it take you to see the solution
Ir was over a minute for me
 

Attachments

It took me about 15 seconds as well.
That is, so long as we are allowed to take a match from the + and make it a -2 on the RHS.

-Dan
 
i think generally we all make math harder than it is:cool:
 
Same 15 secs, give or take a few?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top