MHB How Many Dogs Did the Pet Store Sell in March?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycmathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dogs
AI Thread Summary
In March, the pet store sold twice as many dogs as cats, leading to the equation where dogs equal 2x and cats equal x. In April, the store sold 200 dogs and 150 cats, calculated from the March sales. The total number of pets sold in March and April combined was confirmed to be 500. This resulted in 100 dogs sold in March, as derived from the equations. The calculations were verified to be correct, emphasizing the importance of checking work.
nycmathdad
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
A certain pet store sells only dogs and cats. In March, the store sold twice as many dogs as cats. In April, the store sold twice the number of dogs that it sold in March, and three times the number of cats that it sold in March. If the total number of pets the store sold in March and April combined was 500, how many dogs did the store sell in March?

Let me see.

Note: twice as many dogs as cats in March:

Dogs = 2x

Cats = x

In April:

Dogs = 2(2x) + 3x

Total number of pets sold = 500

Here is my equation:

2x + x + 2(2x) + 3x = 500

10x = 500

x = 500/10

x = 50

In March, the store sold twice as many dogs as cats. Here, x represents the number of cats. Twice that amount is 100. I say the number of dogs sold in March is 100.

You say?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Beer soaked ramblings follow.
nycmathdad said:
...
You say?
I say you should be done with mind numbing trivial stuff like this after 14 years of Precalculus review. You should be doing something more challenging.
 
nycmathdad said:
A certain pet store sells only dogs and cats. In March, the store sold twice as many dogs as cats. In April, the store sold twice the number of dogs that it sold in March, and three times the number of cats that it sold in March. If the total number of pets the store sold in March and April combined was 500, how many dogs did the store sell in March?

Let me see.

Note: twice as many dogs as cats in March:

Dogs = 2x

Cats = x

In April:

Dogs = 2(2x) + 3x
No. The number of dogs sold was 2(2x)= 5x and the number of cats sold was 3x.
The total number of pets sold in April was 2(2x)+ 3x= 7x.

Total number of pets sold = 500

Here is my equation:

2x + x + 2(2x) + 3x = 500

10x = 500

x = 500/10

x = 50

In March, the store sold twice as many dogs as cats. Here, x represents the number of cats. Twice that amount is 100. I say the number of dogs sold in March is 100.

You say?
Yes, that is correct. It would be a good idea to check your work in the words of the original problem:1
"A certain pet store sells only dogs and cats. In March, the store sold twice as many dogs as cats.
If the store sold 50 cats and 100 dogs in March then, yes, the store sold twice as many dogs as cats.

"In April, the store sold twice the number of dogs that it sold in March,"
So in April the store solve 2(100)= 200 dogs.

"and three times the number of cats that it sold in March."
So the store sold 3(50)= 150 cats in March

"If the total number of pets the store sold in March and April combined was 500"
50+ 100+ 200+ 150=300+ 200= 500. Yes, that checks.

It was intelligent of you to write 2x= 100 dogs as the answer. A lot of people would have arrived at "x= 50" and stopped there!
 
Country Boy said:
No. The number of dogs sold was 2(2x)= 5x and the number of cats sold was 3x.
The total number of pets sold in April was 2(2x)+ 3x= 7x.Yes, that is correct. It would be a good idea to check your work in the words of the original problem:1
"A certain pet store sells only dogs and cats. In March, the store sold twice as many dogs as cats.
If the store sold 50 cats and 100 dogs in March then, yes, the store sold twice as many dogs as cats.

"In April, the store sold twice the number of dogs that it sold in March,"
So in April the store solve 2(100)= 200 dogs.

"and three times the number of cats that it sold in March."
So the store sold 3(50)= 150 cats in March

"If the total number of pets the store sold in March and April combined was 500"
50+ 100+ 200+ 150=300+ 200= 500. Yes, that checks.

It was intelligent of you to write 2x= 100 dogs as the answer. A lot of people would have arrived at "x= 50" and stopped there!
In your reply, you said 2(2x) = 5x. I assume this to be a typo. I got the right answer. Another check for me.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top