MHB How many draws until all paired tea bags are gone from the jar?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RWood
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the expected number of draws, D, required to deplete paired tea bags from a jar containing 2*N bags. Initially, all bags are paired, and the selection process involves randomly choosing either a pair or a single bag. The range for D is established between N and 2*N-1, depending on the selection outcomes. Participants express uncertainty about the complexity of the problem, with one recalling a possible connection to a previous mathematical discussion. The conversation highlights the need for further exploration of recursion equations or a general formulation for a solution.
RWood
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I suspect this is not really an "advanced" probability question, but I'm not sure - haven't been near this stuff for decades.

The definition: I have a jar with 2*N tea bags in it (N>0 obviously). The beginning condition is that the teabags are joined in pairs - so there are N pairs. At each selection I select an item at random - initially that will be a pair of bags, in which case I tear one off and put the other back. On later turns I randomly select either a single bag, which would then be used, or a pair of joined bags (if there are any left), in which case I tear one off and proceed as above. What is the probability distribution - and hence the expectation - for D, the number of "drawings" required before there are no paired bags left in the jar?

It is clear that the values for D can range from N (by happening to always select paired bags) to 2*N-1.

I can see some ways of getting recursion equations, but I suspect that this problem has a simple answer resulting from a more general formulation. Any quick answers? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RWood said:
I suspect this is not really an "advanced" probability question, but I'm not sure - haven't been near this stuff for decades.

The definition: I have a jar with 2*N tea bags in it (N>0 obviously). The beginning condition is that the teabags are joined in pairs - so there are N pairs. At each selection I select an item at random - initially that will be a pair of bags, in which case I tear one off and put the other back. On later turns I randomly select either a single bag, which would then be used, or a pair of joined bags (if there are any left), in which case I tear one off and proceed as above. What is the probability distribution - and hence the expectation - for D, the number of "drawings" required before there are no paired bags left in the jar?

It is clear that the values for D can range from N (by happening to always select paired bags) to 2*N-1.

I can see some ways of getting recursion equations, but I suspect that this problem has a simple answer resulting from a more general formulation. Any quick answers? Thanks.

I can't give you any help with this at present, I will have to think about it. However I can say I have seen this problem somewhere before, and vaguely recall it being connected with Herman Bondi (I suspect there was a note either in Mathematics Today or the Mathematical Gazette about it, but that is no help since my filling system makes it impossible to find even if I knew which and which year..).

CB
 
Last edited:
CaptainBlack said:
I can't give you any help with this at present, I will have to think about it. However I can say I have seen this problem somewhere before, and vaguely recall it being connected with Herman Bondi (I suspect there was a note either in Mathematics Today or the Mathematical Gazette about it, but that is no help since my filling system makes it impossible to find even if I knew which and which year..).

CB

Thank you for the update, will see what develops.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.