MHB How many envelopes did Elias have at first

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Elias, Fiona and Simon had a total of 526 envelopes. Elias had the least number of envelopes. The ratio of Fiona's envelopes to Simon's envelopes was 5 : 4 at first. After Fiona and Elias had each lost $\dfrac{1}{2}$ of their envelopes, Fiona had 73 more envelopes than Elias. Given that the three of them had 359 envelopes left, how many envelopes did Elias have at first?

For those who are interested, if you want, you can try to solve this problem using the Singapore model method. (Nod)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let "E" be the number of envelopes Elias has, let "F" be the number of envelopes Fiona has, and let "S" be the number of envelopes Simon has.

"The ratio of Fiona's envelopes to Simon's envelopes was 5 : 4 at first."
So $\frac{F}{S}=\frac{5}{4}$. That can also be written as $F= \frac{5}{4}S$ or $4F= 5S$.

"After Fiona and Elias had each lost 1/2 of their envelopes, Fiona had 73 more envelopes than Elias."
Fiona lost half of her envelopes (Don't you just hate when that happens?) so she had $\frac{F}{2}$ envelopes left. Similarly Elias had $\frac{E}{2}$ envelopes left. $\frac{F}{2}= \frac{E}{2}+ 73$. You can multiply both sides by 2 and write that as $F= E+ 146$.

"the three of them had 359 envelopes left". Fiona had $\frac{F}{2}$ envelopes left, Elias had $\frac{E}{2}$ envelopes left, and, assuming that Simon did not lose any of his envelopes, Simon still had S envelopes left

$\frac{F}{2}+ \frac{E}{2}+ S= 359$. Again we can multiply both sides by 2 (just because I don't like fractions) and get $F+ E+ 2S= 718$.

Now we have the three equations
4F= 5S
F= E+ 146 and
F+ E+ 2S= 718

Although the problem specifically asks only for the number of envelopes Elias had at first, E, since E does not appear in the first equation, I would start by eliminating E. From F= E+ 146, E= F- 146 Then F+ E+ 2S= F+ F- 146+ 2S= 2F+ 2S- 146= 718. Adding 146 to both sides, 2F+ 2S= 864. Dividing both sides by 2, F+ S= 432. It is also true, from 4F= 5S, that F= (5/4)S so F+ S= (5/4)S+ S=(5/4)S+ (4/4)S= (9/4)S= 432. Dividing both sides by 9/4, S= (432)(4/9)= (4)(48)= 192. Simon had 192 envelopes. Then F= (5/4)S= (5/4)(192)= 240. Fiona had 240 envelopes. Finally, E= F- 146= 240- 146= 94. Elias originally had 94 envelopes.

Check:
"The ratio of Fiona's envelopes to Simon's envelopes was 5 : 4 at first."
$\frac{F}{S}= \frac{240}{192}= \frac{120}{96}= \frac{60}{48}= \frac{30}{24}= \frac{15}{12}= \frac{5}{4}$.

"After Fiona and Elias had each lost 1/2 of their envelopes, Fiona had 73 more envelopes than Elias."
After losing half of her 240 envelopes, Fiona had 120 left. After losing half of his 94 envelopes, Elias had 47 left. Yes, 120 is 120- 47= 73 more than 94.

"the three of them had 359 envelopes left"
After losing the envelopes, Fiona had 120 envelopes left, Elias had 47 envelopes left, and Simon still had his 192 envelopes. Yes, 120+ 47+ 192= 359."Envelopes" are kind of dull! Couldn't this have been candies, or ponies, or dragons?

And, since they are envelopes, why "lose" them? It would have more sense if Fiona and Elias had mailed half their envelopes!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top