How many stereoisomers does the compound PF3Cl2 have?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A13235378
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stereoisomers of the compound PF3Cl2, with an initial claim of five isomers. However, it is clarified that the correct number is three, as some structures identified are mesocompounds, which count as stereoisomers. Participants engage in analyzing the differences between the structures and their classifications. The confusion arises from misidentifying certain mesocompounds, but ultimately, the mistake is acknowledged and corrected. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying stereoisomers in chemical structures.
A13235378
Messages
50
Reaction score
10
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Summary:: Isomery

My attemption: (I found 5)

Sem título.png

But the answer is 3 forms, where I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For whatever reason, I think the issue is that the top right structure and the bottom structure are mesocompounds and the top 2 middle ones are mesocompounds as well, I could be very wrong but that's what I am thinking.
 
What makes you think 1 is different from 2, or 3 from 4?
 
  • Like
Likes TeethWhitener and A13235378
Nick tringali said:
For whatever reason, I think the issue is that the top right structure and the bottom structure are mesocompounds and the top 2 middle ones are mesocompounds as well, I could be very wrong but that's what I am thinking.
Exactly, they are mesocompounds, but they also count as stereoisomers.
 
  • Like
Likes Nick tringali
mjc123 said:
What makes you think 1 is different from 2, or 3 from 4?
Yes you are right. I already found my mistake
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top