How Much Do We Really Know About the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmb
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the extent of human knowledge, particularly what is knowable versus unknowable. Participants express varying views on whether humanity has a comprehensive understanding of the universe or if we are only partially informed. There is a consensus that while significant progress has been made in understanding the universe, particularly in the last century, much remains unknown. Concerns are raised about the perception that science has all the answers, suggesting that society may not fully grasp the limits of our knowledge. The conversation also touches on the nature of knowledge itself, questioning its value and the implications of definitions in philosophical discourse. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the complexity of knowledge and the ongoing quest for understanding in the face of the unknowable.
cmb
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
128
Excluding what is unknowable, and stuff that is made up (stories, soap opera plot lines, stuff like that), how much do we know that is knowable.

This is a semi-serious philosophical question, I'm not after a scientifically referenced percentage just opinions and thoughts from the highly knowledgeable forum congregation here.

But, I mean, we seem to know a heck of a lot and discovered the inner ticking clock workings of the universe to a degree over the last century in particular.

How much more is there to go? Have we got a mostly complete picture, or just half way there, or we are ridiculously naïve and know so little that if we met a vastly more informed and intelligent extra terrestrial species they'd look upon our level of intelligent understanding like we would look upon a slug?

I think we're 'sort of half way there' but haven't quite got all the data in yet to join up the dots. I fear that some people (particularly at political levels) think science holds all the answers already.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much is known is unknown.
 
We seem to know a lot about the relationship of things and less about the absolute nature of things and given that our most advanced theories are pushing at the frontier of the unknowable already, I think as a society, we know a lot of what is actually knowable.
 
Last edited:
bob012345 said:
I think as a society, we know a lot of what is actually knowable.
Makes sense, we know what we know.
It also seems reasonable that we will never know what is unknowable.
 
Doesn't this beg the question what is knowledge? What about Laplace's demon, for example. Not all knowledge is equally valuable to most of us. We all remember useless things that we would be happy to forget, for example.

This is why I'm not a fan of most philosophical questions, many ultimately boil down to definitions and semantics. Disagreements are usually the result of poorly defined questions.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top