How Much Do We Really Know About the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmb
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the extent of human knowledge, particularly what is knowable versus unknowable. Participants express varying views on whether humanity has a comprehensive understanding of the universe or if we are only partially informed. There is a consensus that while significant progress has been made in understanding the universe, particularly in the last century, much remains unknown. Concerns are raised about the perception that science has all the answers, suggesting that society may not fully grasp the limits of our knowledge. The conversation also touches on the nature of knowledge itself, questioning its value and the implications of definitions in philosophical discourse. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the complexity of knowledge and the ongoing quest for understanding in the face of the unknowable.
cmb
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
128
Excluding what is unknowable, and stuff that is made up (stories, soap opera plot lines, stuff like that), how much do we know that is knowable.

This is a semi-serious philosophical question, I'm not after a scientifically referenced percentage just opinions and thoughts from the highly knowledgeable forum congregation here.

But, I mean, we seem to know a heck of a lot and discovered the inner ticking clock workings of the universe to a degree over the last century in particular.

How much more is there to go? Have we got a mostly complete picture, or just half way there, or we are ridiculously naïve and know so little that if we met a vastly more informed and intelligent extra terrestrial species they'd look upon our level of intelligent understanding like we would look upon a slug?

I think we're 'sort of half way there' but haven't quite got all the data in yet to join up the dots. I fear that some people (particularly at political levels) think science holds all the answers already.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much is known is unknown.
 
We seem to know a lot about the relationship of things and less about the absolute nature of things and given that our most advanced theories are pushing at the frontier of the unknowable already, I think as a society, we know a lot of what is actually knowable.
 
Last edited:
bob012345 said:
I think as a society, we know a lot of what is actually knowable.
Makes sense, we know what we know.
It also seems reasonable that we will never know what is unknowable.
 
Doesn't this beg the question what is knowledge? What about Laplace's demon, for example. Not all knowledge is equally valuable to most of us. We all remember useless things that we would be happy to forget, for example.

This is why I'm not a fan of most philosophical questions, many ultimately boil down to definitions and semantics. Disagreements are usually the result of poorly defined questions.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top