How much of a game of luck is chess?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magpies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chess Game
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether chess incorporates elements of luck or is purely a game of skill. Participants explore various perspectives on the role of chance in chess compared to other games, such as poker, and consider the implications of personal circumstances on performance.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that chess has no random elements, asserting that the only chance factor is who plays first, which may provide a slight advantage.
  • Others contend that personal circumstances, such as emotional states or life events, can introduce elements of luck that affect performance, even if the game itself is deterministic.
  • A few participants draw parallels between chess and poker, suggesting that while poker has random elements (like card dealing), chess does not, leading to differing views on the nature of luck in both games.
  • Some assert that chess is almost purely a game of skill, with no chance involved, while others express skepticism about this view, suggesting that the definition of luck may vary based on context.
  • There are claims that games can be duplicated in chess, contrasting with poker, where the randomness of card dealing prevents exact replication of games.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the role of luck in chess. Multiple competing views remain, with some firmly asserting that chess is a game of skill, while others believe that personal factors can introduce elements of luck.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing definitions of luck and skill, and the discussion highlights the complexity of categorizing games based on these concepts. There are unresolved nuances regarding how personal circumstances may influence game outcomes.

magpies
Messages
177
Reaction score
2
I have friends that say chess doesn't have any luck aspect to it. I see where they are coming from but I don't really agree with them. So for me it's not a matter of if chess is a game of luck it's more a question of how much? I personally would guess that chess is very much a game of luck so much I have problems finding where skill plays a role. So for you is chess a game of luck or skill and if so how much?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a game of chance in the game sense, there is no random element in each move (no dice).
The only chance element is who goes first - which does give you a slight advantage.
 
Well I could say the same about poker really. The only random element in that game is what color viser you put on right?

Many aspects of poker might seem random to thouse that don't understand it is what I ment.
 
mgb_phys said:
It's not a game of chance in the game sense, there is no random element in each move (no dice).
The only chance element is who goes first - which does give you a slight advantage.

Or it may seem to give an advantage, but until the game is solved it is unknown if a perfect game from both sides would give the win to the player with the first turn.
 
magpies said:
Well I could say the same about poker really. The only random element in that game is what color viser you put on right?.
The cards you are dealt are random.
This doesn't mean there is no skill, there is obviously a skill to making the best of your set of hands. I suppose for a professional poker player the actual cards are of less significance if they can bluff another player into folding - but in a strict game theory sense it is a game with a chance element.
 
magpies said:
Well I could say the same about poker really. The only random element in that game is what color viser you put on right?

Many aspects of poker might seem random to thouse that don't understand it is what I ment.

In poker you are dealt 5 random cards from a stack of 52. Where is the random element in chess? If you can't find one (because there isn't one) then you have to conclude there is no "luck" involved - because after all luck can be roughly defined as a favorable outcome which is unlikely to happen.
 
flashprogram said:
Or it may seem to give an advantage, but until the game is solved it is unknown if a perfect game from both sides would give the win to the player with the first turn.
True but statistically it seems to help in the imperfect games played so far!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-move_advantage_in_chess
 
I personally can see many aspects of chess that require luck I find it odd that most people say they do not. Like suppose your wife leaves you for your best friend the day before the tournament? Is that not considered luck? Wouldn't something like that possibly play a roll in your games?
 
magpies said:
I personally can see many aspects of chess that require luck I find it odd that most people say they do not. Like suppose your wife leaves you for your best friend the day before the tournament? Is that not considered luck? Wouldn't something like that possibly play a roll in your games?

ugh... if you want to scrutinize how ever little event in someone's life can affect their game then there's no point even trying to debate this (although it was pointless from the start). The fact is there are no elements of chance in chess - you simply have to decide what move you want to make. Good or bad decisions are not "luck" so there is no luck in chess.
 
  • #10
Well I do agree with you that chess is not a game of luck just like poker is not a game of luck.
 
  • #11
When you are talking about games chance has a specific technical meaning, yes in 'real life' other personnel factors also intrude.
But for example:
Roulette is a game of pure chance, there is nothing you can do to change the outcome by your skill.
Pontoon is mostly chance with a little skill (don't twist on 17)
Poker is a little chance with a greater deal of skill.
Chess is (almost) pure skill with no chance (other than the white going first advantage)
Go is purely a game of skill
 
  • #12
I don't know if I agree... I think all of thouse games you pointed out are games of skill with no chance.
 
  • #13
magpies said:
I don't know if I agree... I think all of thouse games you pointed out are games of skill with no chance.
Then I recommend you don't visit Vegas
 
  • #14
If only you could play chess on a machine at vegas for money that would be awsome.
 
  • #15
Sorry, magpie, your idea of luck versus skill needs some tweaking.

Luck does not mean whether you had a bad day. The events unfold in a game of chess exactly how you control them to. There are no aspects of the game that are out of the control of the players. The game is wholly deterministic.

In a game of poker, the cards that are dealt to the players are not in the players' control. That is the element of chance.


Think of it this way:

A game of chess could be duplicated exactly every time by any two players both playing by the rules. All they need is a notepad to record the moves.

A game of poker (which, in following the rules, uses a shuffled (i.e randomized) deck each time) can not be duplicated.
 
  • #16
Actually if you play enough poker games you will find many things get duplicated all the time. Also in games of chess you generally don't have a notepad with all your old moves recorded. If you did however why would you follow the same moves if it results in your loss?
 
  • #17
magpies said:
Actually if you play enough poker games you will find many things get duplicated all the time. Also in games of chess you generally don't have a notepad with all your old moves recorded. If you did however why would you follow the same moves if it results in your loss?
None of these comments changes anything I said.

There are no elements of chess that are outside the players' control.
There is a significant element of poker that is outside the players' control and, in fact, anyone else's control i.e. chance.
 
  • #18
magpies said:
Well I do agree with you that chess is not a game of luck just like poker is not a game of luck.
No. Just no. This is too obvious to even comment further on.

Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K