MHB How Much Would I Earn If I Worked 4 Weeks On and 4 Weeks Off?

  • Thread starter Thread starter benji1231
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Year
Click For Summary
Earnings for a 4 weeks on, 4 weeks off schedule depend on the shift pay structure. If the brother earns $1,400 per shift, clarification is needed on what constitutes a "shift" and whether he follows the same schedule. The calculation of $182,000 assumes a standard 5-day work week over 26 weeks, which may not apply if shifts are defined differently. The discussion raises questions about the actual hourly rate, suggesting that $1,400 for a single shift may not align with typical hourly wages. Clear definitions of work hours and pay are essential for accurate earnings estimates.
benji1231
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I work 4 weeks on and 4 weeks off, how much will I earn? My brother will be earning 1400 every shift, so would my brother earn $1,400 per shift x 5 days per week x 26 weeks per year = $182,000?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
benji123 said:
If I work 4 weeks on and 4 weeks off, how much will I earn? My brother will be earning 1400 every shift, so would my brother earn
\$1,400 per shift x 5 days per week x 26 weeks per year = \$182,000?

Will you be paid the same shift salary as your brother? Does your brother follow the 4 week on/off schedule, also?

\$1400 per shift? Really?
 
What do you mean by a "shift"? I would normally interpret a "shift" to be a standard 8 hour day but \$1400 seems a bit much for 8 hours! (\$175 an hour!)

If a "shift" is the "four weeks on" then that would be 4(7)(8)= 224 hours. \$1400/224= \$6.25 per hour, a bit more reasonable.

But it is very confusing for you to ask about your earnings but only tell us about your brother's salary!
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K