How science literate is the general public?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrnike992
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article Scientific
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a quiz assessing the scientific literacy of the general public, particularly focusing on misconceptions surrounding the Big Bang theory and basic scientific principles. Participants express concern over the alarming percentage of Americans who answered incorrectly, highlighting a broader issue of scientific illiteracy in the education system. Key points include the misinterpretation of the Big Bang as a "huge explosion" and the inadequacy of the quiz's 11 questions to represent comprehensive scientific knowledge. The conversation emphasizes the necessity for improved science education and the importance of accurate phrasing in scientific questions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Big Bang theory and its implications in cosmology.
  • Basic knowledge of atomic structure and quantum mechanics, particularly the concept of electron wavefunctions.
  • Familiarity with geological concepts, including tectonic plates and continental drift.
  • Awareness of common misconceptions in scientific literacy among the general public.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the nuances of the Big Bang theory and its correct interpretation in scientific discourse.
  • Explore the role of quantum mechanics in atomic theory, focusing on electron behavior and wavefunctions.
  • Investigate the educational strategies for improving scientific literacy in public schools.
  • Examine comprehensive assessments of scientific knowledge, including studies that utilize larger sample sizes and varied question formats.
USEFUL FOR

Educators, science communicators, policymakers, and anyone interested in enhancing public understanding of scientific concepts and addressing misconceptions in science education.

  • #31
QuantumCurt said:
I just said that there are indeed many unintelligent folks in the world. However, a less than complete body of scientific literacy does not make one unintelligent.
and i did not say they were simply because they got answers wrong either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
QuantumCurt said:
ETA - If you don't think that working in the stock market is a skill, then you must really not understand how the stock market works.

the stock market can be simplified to : rushing into take advantage of a trend. paying attention to trends and using them to invest or pull out is about as skillful as slapping a mosquito. knowing what a bull or bear market are only means your playing the ups and downs it really is that simple trying to say its complicated only shows your the one who doesn't understand it. if it wasn't for insider trading most of the big shots in trading would have lost their shirts at it. because its a form of gambling and no one wins every bet.
 
  • #33
dragoneyes001 said:
the stock market can be simplified to : rushing into take advantage of a trend. paying attention to trends and using them to invest or pull out is about as skillful as slapping a mosquito. knowing what a bull or bear market are only means your playing the ups and downs it really is that simple trying to say its complicated only shows your the one who doesn't understand it. if it wasn't for insider trading most of the big shots in trading would have lost their shirts at it. because its a form of gambling and no one wins every bet.

And there is the additional fact that most of these financial/market advisors do not beat the market. Flip a coin, or get a Ouija board to help you select your stock picks and you will, on average, fare as well as these stock market geniuses.
 
  • #34
This has clearly gone farther than intended, and while we're all idiots, can a mod or somebody please close this thread? Thanks.
 
  • #35
This thread is done. closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mrnike992

Similar threads

Open Access Scientific Publications
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
229
How will public react if we discover life on another planet?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Should the public know what you are thinking and concluding?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Adding drama and controversy to scientific articles for the public
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Discussion on the science-literature relationship and more
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Is the Scientific Paper Still Effective?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
News Post-Scientific Technocratic Methodologies
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
News Does 'pack journalism' shape the science news we read?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
How reliable are peer reviewed scientific articles?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
High School Dumbing down of science for the general population
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K