How should the money be divided between Frank and Sammy?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tedbradly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Riddle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how to fairly divide the money earned from selling a portion of a watermelon between two individuals, Frank and Sammy, based on their initial contributions and subsequent actions involving a third party, Billy. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding proportional division and the implications of their agreement.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the division of the watermelon to Billy affects the calculation, considering whether the 1/3 sold to Billy came from Frank's or Sammy's initial contributions.
  • Another participant raises the issue of whether the price paid by Billy should be based on the whole melon or just the portion he received, suggesting that this could influence the division of the money.
  • A later reply indicates that the answers to the problem may be complex and riddles in themselves, hinting at the intricacies involved in resolving the division fairly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to approach the division of money, indicating that there is no consensus on the method to be used for calculating the fair share for Frank and Sammy.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not resolved assumptions regarding the method of division, the definitions of portions sold, and the implications of their agreement on the sale to Billy.

tedbradly
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
Frank and Sammy bought a watermelon for forty-eight cents, Frank contributing thirty cents and Sammy eighteen, which they were going to divide in proportion to their relative investements, when, spying Billy passing on the road, they conspired to unload a third of the melon upon him for the cost of the whole. After Billy had gone the boys proceeded to divide the money as they thought right, and then each of them ate a half of the remainder. How should the money be divided between Frank and Sammy?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Frank should get thirty cents and Sammy eighteen. That way, each equally contributed zero and each equally ate a third of the melon.
 
Sammy should pay Frank 4 cents.

Frank bought 5/8 of a melon with his 30 cents and Sammy bought 3/8 with his 18 cents. So, Frank should get 5/8 of the money from Billy, plus 5/8 of the remainder of the melon, while Sammy gets 3/8 of the money from Billy, plus 3/8 of the remainder of the melon. There's 8/12 of a melon left and each ate 4/12 of a melon instead of 5/12 & 3/12, so Sammy owes Frank for 1/12 of a melon. And at 48 cents for a whole melon, that comes to 4 cents for a 1/12.
 
BobG said:
Sammy should pay Frank 4 cents.

Frank bought 5/8 of a melon with his 30 cents and Sammy bought 3/8 with his 18 cents. So, Frank should get 5/8 of the money from Billy, plus 5/8 of the remainder of the melon, while Sammy gets 3/8 of the money from Billy, plus 3/8 of the remainder of the melon. There's 8/12 of a melon left and each ate 4/12 of a melon instead of 5/12 & 3/12, so Sammy owes Frank for 1/12 of a melon. And at 48 cents for a whole melon, that comes to 4 cents for a 1/12.

yup...
 
I suppose it depends on whose 1/3 of the melon Billy purchased. Did 1/6 come from Frank and 1/6 come from Sammy? Or did they sell Billy the 1/3 according to the proportion they had divided the melon already? By rights, Sammy or Frank could have sold Billy the entire 1/3 out of their own portion, and then (being 48 cents richer), simply reimburse the other for the extra portion that they ate.

DaveE
 
BobG said:
And at 48 cents for a whole melon, that comes to 4 cents for a 1/12.

Of course, would you pay the 48 cents/whole melon rate, or would you pay the 48 cents/third of a melon rate?

DaveE
 
Official solution:

In the watermelon problem, some boys would say: Frank should get back his 30 cents and Charlie[sic] 18: then they get their feast for nothing. Brainy mathematicians would try to convince the boys that Frank owned 30-48 of the melon, and Sammy 18-48; and so Billy bought 16-48, Frank sold 14-48 and Sammy but 2-48, and as he got three times what his part cost, Frank should receive 42 cents and Sammy 6 cents. This is the answer given in the books, but just listen to what Sammy says is the correct answer: We bought the melon for 48 cents and unloaded on the guy 1-3 for the cost of the whole, so we each took back our original money. Now Sammy owns 18-48 of the remainder, which is 12-48 of the whole melon, and Frank owns 30-48 of the remainder, which is 20-48 of a melon, and as Sammy must now buy 4-48 to eat one-half, he pays Frank 4 cents and has 14 cents left, and Frank 34 cents. The error of the popular solution consists in permitting Frank to unload that 1-12 upon Sammy at a profit instead of at cost. Sammy was no guy!

His answers are riddles in and of themselves.
 
Last edited: