How Should We Visualize Dark Matter Around Spiral Galaxies?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ryan albery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the visualization of dark matter surrounding spiral galaxies, specifically whether it is best represented as spherical or oblate. The consensus indicates that dark matter forms a halo with a density gradient, denser at the center and tapering off, as described by the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile. Dark matter particles maintain their orbits due to weak interactions, preventing them from collapsing into the galaxy's center. Additionally, the rotation of dark matter is largely independent of the galaxy's rotation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dark matter halo structures
  • Familiarity with the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile
  • Basic knowledge of galaxy dynamics and rotation
  • Concept of weakly-interacting particles in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile in detail
  • Explore the concept of triaxial dark matter haloes and their observational implications
  • Study the dynamics of weakly-interacting particles in astrophysical contexts
  • Investigate the relationship between dark matter and galaxy rotation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in galaxy formation and dark matter dynamics will benefit from this discussion.

ryan albery
Messages
67
Reaction score
1
Does it make sense to visualize dark matter as roughly spherical, or oblate, around a spiral galaxy? Perhaps incorrectly, I picture dark matter as analogous to a planet, or star, with the visible disk of the galaxy forming the equatorial plane. Is this reasonable picture of what we observe through lensing, and accounting for the constant rate of rotation? If so, is there thought to be a radial density gradient in the dark matter, something akin to the mostly linear density gradient of Earth's atmosphere, or is the dark matter thought to be more of a constant density? Also, does the dark matter rotate with the galaxy? If the planet analogy is reasonable, insomuch as the dark matter has an axis of rotation, what's the force is that keeps what I'll assume to be 'particles' of dark matter near the poles from simply falling into the center of the galaxy?

Much thanks to anyone who can set me straight, and thanks so much to everyone for making this such a valuable resource for learning about the universe!
 
Space news on Phys.org
The general picture is of a galaxy surrounded by a dark matter halo that goes out to many times the extent of the luminous matter. Haloes definitely have a density gradient, being denser in the centre and becoming more tenuous as you move outwards. I know that some observations support spherically-symmetric density profiles, in which the density depends only on radial distance r, from the the centre. See for example the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile. On the other hand, I know that triaxial haloes have been found to better match/explain observations in some instances.
 
I usually prefer to think of dark matter as being a large, smoothly-distributed gas of weakly-interacting particles, more dense in the center and tapering slowly out to the edge, with a much smaller galaxy sitting in the center of it. The individual particles of dark matter all have their own orbits around the center of mass. The main reason why they don't just fall to the center and stay at the center is that because they interact so weakly, they have no way to lose energy. So as they fall towards the center of the galaxy, they pick up a large velocity that just pushes them right back out to as far as they came in.

The rotation of dark matter is probably completely unrelated to the rotation of the galaxy that's sitting inside it, because there is so little interaction between the two.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K