How Small Can We Really Go in the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fakts
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the smallest units in the universe, primarily focusing on quarks and electrons, which are considered point particles with no volume. Participants express confusion over the idea of a "smallest" particle, suggesting that there may always be smaller components, while others clarify that quarks and electrons are fundamental and not made of anything smaller. The conversation also touches on the concept of size in the universe, debating whether there is a limit to how large things can get, with references to singularities and the nature of mass and energy. The Planck length is mentioned as the theoretical limit for size, emphasizing its minuscule scale compared to protons. Overall, the thread explores the complexities of both the smallest and largest scales in the universe.
fakts
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Title says it all, and it has been in my head forever
How small can you go? As far as I know, the smallest known this is what makes a proton which called quarks? but still, a quark must be made of other things and those things are made of even other things and so on.. But till where? infinity?
I can't imagine there is such thing as smallest and no smaller than that, at least that's what I think.

Can someone with white beard help me get some sleep?

Thanks

If this has been discussed before please link me and I apologize
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fakts said:
still, a quark must be made of other things

Must?
 
Well, you get the idea
 
It's quarks all the way down.
 
an electron is a point particle - it has no volume - that's about as small as you can get. same thing with quarks - point particles, no volume. that pretty much covers everything...
 
Ok, and what makes that point a point?
 
quarks and electrons are point particles because they have no extension in space. i don't quite understand what you mean by "what makes a point a point"...
 
I'm sorry for being silly, but I'm not a physicist and I see things as an amount of smaller things, like a house is made out of bricks and bricks are made out of smaller things and so on.
So I'm having difficulties saying this is is the smallest thing and its not made out of anything smaller :confused:
I thought that maybe you can just go forever from small to smaller to smaller and never to smallest.
 
again, a point particle has zero volume - you cannot get any smaller than zero volume. there is not, and cannot be, anything smaller than a point particle. point particles are not made of anything smaller. that is why we call them fundamental particles.
 
  • #10
At some point, theorizing, I think mass becomes energy. Because what I've heard, they are the same thing.
What makes up energy? Thats what you're going to have to ask someone smarter than me.
 
  • #11
jnorman,

Thanks a lot for taking the time
Just one question, does the same thing apply for the very big? I mean is there an end to the size of the universe or multi-universe as I heard once in some doc?
There is no wall where everything stops, is there? hehe
 
  • #12
oye vey - i don't think there is a limit on big, other than the debate over closed vs open universe. OTOH, if you are talking about the physical size of an object contained within the universe, once any object gets to a certain mass, it will eventually collapse upon itself into a singularity, which once again is a point with no physical size.
 
  • #13
jnorman said:
oye vey - i don't think there is a limit on big, other than the debate over closed vs open universe. OTOH, if you are talking about the physical size of an object contained within the universe, once any object gets to a certain mass, it will eventually collapse upon itself into a singularity, which once again is a point with no physical size.

A star which has collapsed into a neutron star or a black hole has a physical size.
I don't know if this is what you meant though.
 
  • #14
fawk3s said:
A star which has collapsed into a neutron star or a black hole has a physical size.
I don't know if this is what you meant though.

I think he's talking about where all that matter condenses into a point of zero volume, i.e. the singularity.
 
  • #15
fakts said:
I'm sorry for being silly, but I'm not a physicist and I see things as an amount of smaller things, like a house is made out of bricks and bricks are made out of smaller things and so on.
So I'm having difficulties saying this is is the smallest thing and its not made out of anything smaller :confused:
I thought that maybe you can just go forever from small to smaller to smaller and never to smallest.

Plank length puts limit on the smallest dimension which is 1.616×10^-35 Meter. Nothing can be smaller than this. Plank length is 10^20 times smaller than proton diameter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length
 
Back
Top