Chemistry How to apply Nernst equation in this problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Nernst equation to a redox reaction involving gold and chlorine. The standard cell potential is calculated, revealing that gold can reduce the chlorine redox couple. The reaction quotient, Q, is determined from the balanced chemical equation, leading to a final cell potential of 0.25 V. A previous error in calculating n_r was corrected, confirming the approach is valid. The importance of using the Nernst equation is emphasized due to the non-standard states of the reactants and products.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
In the course of writing out the problem and solving it, I figured out my original question (which turned out to be caused by a mistake I made in literally the final equation in the whole solution). Therefore, this post doesn't really have a question in it at this point. It is simply my whole solution.

You construct a galvanic cell using the two half cells below

$$\mathrm{Au^+(aq)+e^-\rightarrow Au(s)}$$

$$\mathrm{Cl_2(g)+2e^-\rightarrow 2Cl^-(aq)}$$

The initial concentration of ##\mathrm{Au^+}## is 0.10M and of ##\mathrm{Cl^-}## is 0.5M.

The initial pressure of ##\mathrm{Cl_2}## is 1.50atm at ##25^\circ\text{C}##.
Relevant Equations
Using the table below, calculate the initial voltage of the galvanic cell.
This problem is from this problem set from MIT OCW.
1737300199286.png

Here is how I tried to solve the problem.

Looking at the table above, we see that the top-to-bottom order is from largest to smallest standard cell potential.

Since gold, ie Au, is at the top, every other redox couple on the list has the ability to reduce a ##\mathrm{Au^+(aq)/Au(s)}## redox couple, including the redox couple ##\mathrm{Cl^-/Cl_2}##.

The cell

$$\mathrm{Cl^-(aq)|Cl_2(g)||Au^+(aq)|Au(s)}\tag{1}$$

has emf equal to ##1.69V-1.3583V=0.3317\text{V}##.

It appears we can use the Nernst equation.

$$E_{\text{cell}}=E_{\text{cell}}^\circ-\frac{RT}{n_RF}\ln{Q}\tag{2}$$

At ##\mathrm{298.15K}## we have that ##RT/F=0.025693\text{V}## and so

$$E_{cell}=E^\circ_{cell}-\frac{0.025693\text{V}}{n_r}\ln{Q}\tag{3}$$

So what is ##Q##?

It is the reaction quotient. But what is the reaction?

It seems we have the skeleton equation

$$\mathrm{2Cl^-(aq)+Au^+(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+Au(s)}\tag{4}$$

and (I am guessing) we need to balance it using a procedure I learned recently which includes the following intermediate steps

Balanced oxidation half-reaction:

$$\mathrm{Au^+(aq)+e^-\rightarrow Au(s)}\tag{5}$$

Balanced reduction half-reaction

$$\mathrm{2Cl^-(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+2e^-}\tag{6}$$

We multiple (5) by 2 and sum the result with (6) to get

$$\mathrm{2Au^+(aq)+2Cl^-(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+2Au(s)}\tag{7}$$

and the reaction quotient for this chemical reaction seems to be

$$Q=\mathrm{\frac{P_{Cl_2}}{[Au^+]^2[Cl^-]^2}}$$

Using the values given in the problem we find that

$$Q=\frac{1.52}{0.1^20.5^2}=607.95$$

Therefore

$$E_{cell}=0.3317\text{V}-\frac{0.025693\text{V}}{2}\ln{(607.95)}=0.25\text{V}\tag{8}$$

This matches the answer given on MIT OCW.

The first time I wrote this post, I made a mistake in equation (8). Instead of using ##n_r=2## I used ##n_r=1## and got an incorrect result.

Now that I have made this correct, I don't really have a question. I believe the steps above are all correct now.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked all the maths, but that looks like the correct approach to the problem.
 
This is a case of you can subtract the Standard Action Potential's of the two and get the same result. :oldwink:

EDIT: Oops! See the following post by @Borek for the correction.
 
Last edited:
Tom.G said:
This is a case of you can subtract the Standard Action Potential's of the two and get the same result. :oldwink:
Nope, you would get 0.34 V and the answer is 0.25 V.

Neither Au+, Cl- nor Cl2 are in the standard state, so the Nernst equation is a must (even if it is just a plug and chug kind of problem).
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and Tom.G
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top