Chemistry How to apply Nernst equation in this problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying the Nernst equation to calculate the cell potential for the redox reaction involving gold (Au) and chlorine (Cl). The standard cell potential is determined to be 0.3317 V, and the reaction quotient (Q) is calculated as 607.95. The final cell potential, after applying the Nernst equation, is confirmed to be 0.25 V, aligning with the answer provided by MIT OCW. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly identifying the number of electrons transferred in the reaction to achieve accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Nernst equation and its components
  • Knowledge of standard cell potentials and redox reactions
  • Familiarity with calculating reaction quotients (Q)
  • Basic skills in balancing chemical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Nernst equation in detail, including its derivation and applications
  • Learn how to balance complex redox reactions effectively
  • Explore standard reduction potentials for various redox couples
  • Practice calculating cell potentials under non-standard conditions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in electrochemistry, particularly those focusing on redox reactions and cell potential calculations.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
In the course of writing out the problem and solving it, I figured out my original question (which turned out to be caused by a mistake I made in literally the final equation in the whole solution). Therefore, this post doesn't really have a question in it at this point. It is simply my whole solution.

You construct a galvanic cell using the two half cells below

$$\mathrm{Au^+(aq)+e^-\rightarrow Au(s)}$$

$$\mathrm{Cl_2(g)+2e^-\rightarrow 2Cl^-(aq)}$$

The initial concentration of ##\mathrm{Au^+}## is 0.10M and of ##\mathrm{Cl^-}## is 0.5M.

The initial pressure of ##\mathrm{Cl_2}## is 1.50atm at ##25^\circ\text{C}##.
Relevant Equations
Using the table below, calculate the initial voltage of the galvanic cell.
This problem is from this problem set from MIT OCW.
1737300199286.png

Here is how I tried to solve the problem.

Looking at the table above, we see that the top-to-bottom order is from largest to smallest standard cell potential.

Since gold, ie Au, is at the top, every other redox couple on the list has the ability to reduce a ##\mathrm{Au^+(aq)/Au(s)}## redox couple, including the redox couple ##\mathrm{Cl^-/Cl_2}##.

The cell

$$\mathrm{Cl^-(aq)|Cl_2(g)||Au^+(aq)|Au(s)}\tag{1}$$

has emf equal to ##1.69V-1.3583V=0.3317\text{V}##.

It appears we can use the Nernst equation.

$$E_{\text{cell}}=E_{\text{cell}}^\circ-\frac{RT}{n_RF}\ln{Q}\tag{2}$$

At ##\mathrm{298.15K}## we have that ##RT/F=0.025693\text{V}## and so

$$E_{cell}=E^\circ_{cell}-\frac{0.025693\text{V}}{n_r}\ln{Q}\tag{3}$$

So what is ##Q##?

It is the reaction quotient. But what is the reaction?

It seems we have the skeleton equation

$$\mathrm{2Cl^-(aq)+Au^+(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+Au(s)}\tag{4}$$

and (I am guessing) we need to balance it using a procedure I learned recently which includes the following intermediate steps

Balanced oxidation half-reaction:

$$\mathrm{Au^+(aq)+e^-\rightarrow Au(s)}\tag{5}$$

Balanced reduction half-reaction

$$\mathrm{2Cl^-(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+2e^-}\tag{6}$$

We multiple (5) by 2 and sum the result with (6) to get

$$\mathrm{2Au^+(aq)+2Cl^-(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+2Au(s)}\tag{7}$$

and the reaction quotient for this chemical reaction seems to be

$$Q=\mathrm{\frac{P_{Cl_2}}{[Au^+]^2[Cl^-]^2}}$$

Using the values given in the problem we find that

$$Q=\frac{1.52}{0.1^20.5^2}=607.95$$

Therefore

$$E_{cell}=0.3317\text{V}-\frac{0.025693\text{V}}{2}\ln{(607.95)}=0.25\text{V}\tag{8}$$

This matches the answer given on MIT OCW.

The first time I wrote this post, I made a mistake in equation (8). Instead of using ##n_r=2## I used ##n_r=1## and got an incorrect result.

Now that I have made this correct, I don't really have a question. I believe the steps above are all correct now.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked all the maths, but that looks like the correct approach to the problem.
 
This is a case of you can subtract the Standard Action Potential's of the two and get the same result. :oldwink:

EDIT: Oops! See the following post by @Borek for the correction.
 
Last edited:
Tom.G said:
This is a case of you can subtract the Standard Action Potential's of the two and get the same result. :oldwink:
Nope, you would get 0.34 V and the answer is 0.25 V.

Neither Au+, Cl- nor Cl2 are in the standard state, so the Nernst equation is a must (even if it is just a plug and chug kind of problem).
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K