How to Approach an Induction Proof for a Product Ratio Inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thomas Rainey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a product ratio inequality using mathematical induction. The original poster presents a specific inequality involving the product of odd and even integers and seeks guidance on the induction process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the statement for n=1 and then substitute n+1 into the equation. They express uncertainty about their approach and seek validation.
  • Some participants suggest focusing on the relationship between the left and right sides of the inequality as n increases, questioning how the addition of one term affects the overall inequality.
  • Others propose examining the net changes in the products as n progresses, indicating a need to show that the left side remains less than or equal to the right side after the induction step.
  • There is mention of possibly needing a squeeze theorem approach, reflecting uncertainty about the current method's effectiveness.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various interpretations and approaches to the induction proof. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between terms in the inequality, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of induction proofs and the specific nature of the inequality, with some constraints related to the algebraic manipulation of products and ratios. The original poster's attached work is referenced, indicating ongoing attempts to clarify the problem.

Thomas Rainey
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
Prove the following:
(1x3x5x...x(2n-1))/(2x4x6x...x(2n)) <= 1/(2n+1)^.5

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
1) Following the general steps of proof by induction, I first proved that the statement is true for the case n=1.

2) Next, I substituted n+1 for n into the equation.

3) Using algebra, I have hammered away at the problem from every angle that I can think of in hopes to end up with the same formula as in the original case. Is this the correct way to go about solving this problem? My best attempt thus far is in the attached file. My work begins with my substitution of n+1 for n.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-09 at 2.49.01 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-09 at 2.49.01 PM.png
    69.4 KB · Views: 732
Physics news on Phys.org
##1/2 \leq 1/\sqrt3##
Assume that for ##n, \, \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{2n-1}{2n} \leq \left( \frac{1}{2n+1} \right) ^{1/2}##
Then show that it holds true for ##n+1##
The goal is to use the fact that the relation is true for n so you only have to show that the addition of one term doesn't change the fact that the left side is less than the right side.
Think of it as the change to the left divided by the change to the right must be less than or equal to 1 for the induction to work.
 
RUber said:
##1/2 \leq 1/\sqrt3##
Assume that for ##n, \, \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{2n-1}{2n} \leq \left( \frac{1}{2n+1} \right) ^{1/2}##
Then show that it holds true for ##n+1##
The goal is to use the fact that the relation is true for n so you only have to show that the addition of one term doesn't change the fact that the left side is less than the right side.
Think of it as the change to the left divided by the change to the right must be less than or equal to 1 for the induction to work.

I took this approach in my attached work, but still couldn't get the induction to work. Do I have to use some kind of squeeze theorem approach you think?
 
Think about the net change from the ##n^{th} ## evaluation.
On the left side, you are multplying ##x_n## by ##\frac{2n+1}{2n+2}##.
The right side, you could look at as multiplying by ##\sqrt{\frac{2n+1}{2n+3}}##.

Call the nth evaluation of the left side ##L_n##, and the right side ##R_n## or whatever you want.
##L_{n+1}=L_n \frac{2n+1}{2n+2}##
##R_{n+1}=R_n \sqrt{\frac{2n+1}{2n+3}}##.

You need the change on the left to be less than or equal to the change on the right for the induction to work.

You know ##\frac{L_n}{R_n} \leq 1##
You need to show ##\frac{L_{n+1}}{R_{n+1}}\leq 1##
 
There may be times when flipping the fractions is helpful. Remember ## 1/n < a/b \implies n/1 > b/a . ##
 
Thanks for the help! I'll use this approach and see if I can figure it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K