How to calculate Clebsch-Gordon coefficients

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Avijeet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficients
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating Clebsch-Gordon coefficients, which are essential for understanding angular momentum coupling in quantum mechanics. Users reference Griffiths' textbook (p200) for coefficient tables and suggest Zare's "Angular Momentum" for a more comprehensive explanation. While some prefer using Wigner 3-j symbols for their intuitive nature and symmetry properties, Clebsch-Gordon coefficients remain crucial for relating uncoupled and coupled angular momentum representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Clebsch-Gordon coefficients
  • Knowledge of Wigner 3-j symbols
  • Basic proficiency in reading mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients
  • Learn about Wigner 3-j symbols and their properties
  • Review Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" for practical examples
  • Explore Zare's "Angular Momentum" for a deeper theoretical understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with angular momentum, and anyone seeking to understand the mathematical framework of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients and their applications.

Avijeet
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Can anybody tell me how to calculate Clebsch-Gordon coefficients?
I see a table given for the coefficients in some books (Griffiths p200), but it is not clear how to read the table.
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Avijeet said:
Can anybody tell me how to calculate Clebsch-Gordon coefficients?
I see a table given for the coefficients in some books (Griffiths p200), but it is not clear how to read the table.
Any help would be appreciated.

Well, I never use the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients directly in calculations ... I use Wigner 3-j symbols instead.(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-jm_symbol) The CG coeffs are useful because they are directly related to the angular momentum coupling equations, but the Wigner symbols are much more intuitive to use in calculations, and have useful symmetry properties as well. I am not going to give a detailed re-hashing of the CG coeffs here ... the treatment in Griffiths is good .. you could also try Zare's "Angular Momentum", which gives a more thorough description IMO. If you have specific questions, please ask them .. in the meantime I can give the following descriptive summaries that may prove helpful.

CG coeffs are the scalar products of the description between the uncoupled and coupled representations for two angular momentum vectors j1 and j2. In usual notation, <j_1m_1j_2m_2|j_1j_2JM>, the uncoupled representation is on the left, where the z-projections of the two angular momenta are considered separately. The coupled representation is on the right, where the two angular momenta are first added together to give total angular momentum (J), and it's projection on the z-axis (M). Remember there are multiple ways that two angular momenta can be added ... that is the reason we need the CG coefficients in the first place.

The formula for calculating a CG coefficient can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_Clebsch-Gordan_coefficients#Formulation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
583
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K