How to Define a Piecewise Function Without Absolute Value Bars?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on defining the piecewise function for f(x) = |x^2 - 1| without using absolute value bars. The correct piecewise definition is f(x) = {1 - x^2, if |x| < 1; x^2 - 1, if |x| ≥ 1}. The participants clarify that the function is negative on the interval (-1, 1) and non-negative elsewhere. The second proposed definition is deemed correct, while the first is not efficient due to redundancy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piecewise functions
  • Knowledge of absolute value definitions
  • Familiarity with quadratic functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of piecewise functions in calculus
  • Learn about the implications of absolute value in function definitions
  • Explore the behavior of quadratic functions and their graphs
  • Investigate optimization techniques for piecewise functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding piecewise function definitions and their applications in algebra and calculus.

paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
Define the function piecewise without absolute value bars

f(x)=|x^2-1| - what is the core or prevailing function here? is it the absolute value function or the squaring?

please solve this. and show the steps. thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: define the function...

I would use the definition:

$$|x|\equiv\begin{cases}-x & x<0\\ x & 0\le x \\ \end{cases}$$

So, what you want to find, is where the function $$f(x)=x^2-1$$ is negative, and where is it non-negative.
 
Re: define the function...

MarkFL said:
I would use the definition:

$$|x|\equiv\begin{cases}-x & x<0\\ x & 0\le x \\ \end{cases}$$

So, what you want to find, is where the function $$f(x)=x^2-1$$ is negative, and where is it non-negative.

i have two answers

f(x) = {x^2-1 , if x<-1
...{0 , if x=-1 or x=1
...{1-x^2, if -1<x<1

or

f(x) = {x^2-1 , if x<=-1
...{1-x^2, if -1<x<1
...{x^2-1, if x>=1

are they both correct?
 
Re: define the function...

The second one is correct...do you see why the first is not?

The function $f(x)=x^2-1$ is negative on $(-1,1)$, otherwise is is non-negative, so another way we could define $|f(x)|$ is:

$$|f(x)|=\begin{cases}1-x^2 & |x|<1 \\ x^2-1 & 1\le|x| \\ \end{cases}$$
 
Re: define the function...

MarkFL said:
The second one is correct...do you see why the first is not?

The function $f(x)=x^2-1$ is negative on $(-1,1)$, otherwise is is non-negative, so another way we could define $|f(x)|$ is:

$$|f(x)|=\begin{cases}1-x^2 & |x|<1 \\ x^2-1 & 1\le|x| \\ \end{cases}$$

i based my first answer on this definition of abs. value function.

|x|= { x, if x>0
...{ 0, if x=0
...{ -x, if x<0
 
Re: define the function...

You left out $1\le x$. Also, we really don't see special cases for when the expression is equal to zero, we just need to differentiate between negative and non-negative.
 
Re: define the function...

MarkFL said:
You left out $1\le x$. Also, we really don't see special cases for when the expression is equal to zero, we just need to differentiate between negative and non-negative.

oh i see. but what if i add that x>1 to my first answer?

f(x) = {x^2-1 , if x<-1
...{0 , if x=-1 or x=1
...{1-x^2, if -1<x<1
...{x^2-1, if x>1

would this be correct? I just want to explore on the different possible answers. please bear with me.
 
Re: define the function...

Yes, that would be correct, albeit not the most efficient piecewise statement of the function though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K