MHB How to Find the Conditional Density for an Improved Estimator?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the conditional density needed to derive an improved estimator using the Rao-Blackwell theorem. The initial density function presented, f(x,θ) = exp(-√x)/θ, was questioned for its validity as a family of densities. The user initially claimed that √X1/2 is an unbiased estimator and that T(X) = √X1 + ... + √Xn is a sufficient statistic for θ. After some confusion about the density function, the user ultimately found a way to address the question. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying density functions in statistical estimation.
Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Consider a family of densitites $f(x,\theta)=\frac{exp(-{\sqrt{x}})}{{\theta}}$. Let $X_{1}$ be a single observation from this family. I have shown that ${\sqrt{X_{1}}}/2$ is an unbiased estimator. Now consider $n$ observations $X_{1},..X_{n}$. I have shown that $T(X)={\sqrt{X_{1}}}+..+{\sqrt{X_{n}}}$ is a sufficient statistic for $\theta$. Now use the Rao Blackwell theorem to find an improved estimator.

The improved estimator is $E({\sqrt{x}}/2|T)$. For this I need the conditional density. How do I find this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure $$f(x,\theta)$$ is a family of densities?
 
stainburg said:
Are you sure $$f(x,\theta)$$ is a family of densities?

I got the density completely wrong. Anyway I have just found a way to do the question.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top