MHB How to Find the Conditional Density for an Improved Estimator?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the conditional density needed to derive an improved estimator using the Rao-Blackwell theorem. The initial density function presented, f(x,θ) = exp(-√x)/θ, was questioned for its validity as a family of densities. The user initially claimed that √X1/2 is an unbiased estimator and that T(X) = √X1 + ... + √Xn is a sufficient statistic for θ. After some confusion about the density function, the user ultimately found a way to address the question. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying density functions in statistical estimation.
Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Consider a family of densitites $f(x,\theta)=\frac{exp(-{\sqrt{x}})}{{\theta}}$. Let $X_{1}$ be a single observation from this family. I have shown that ${\sqrt{X_{1}}}/2$ is an unbiased estimator. Now consider $n$ observations $X_{1},..X_{n}$. I have shown that $T(X)={\sqrt{X_{1}}}+..+{\sqrt{X_{n}}}$ is a sufficient statistic for $\theta$. Now use the Rao Blackwell theorem to find an improved estimator.

The improved estimator is $E({\sqrt{x}}/2|T)$. For this I need the conditional density. How do I find this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure $$f(x,\theta)$$ is a family of densities?
 
stainburg said:
Are you sure $$f(x,\theta)$$ is a family of densities?

I got the density completely wrong. Anyway I have just found a way to do the question.
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K