How to Find the Limit of This Function Using Only Algebra?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter racer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the limit of the function lim (³√x - 4) / (√x - 8) as x approaches 64 using only algebraic manipulation, explicitly avoiding Newton's Method and L'Hôpital's Rule. The solution involves factoring using the difference of two squares and cubes, recognizing that 4 is a perfect square and 8 is a perfect cube. The approach highlights the use of x^(1/3) and x^(1/2) for the numerator and denominator, respectively, showcasing an impressive algebraic technique.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Familiarity with the difference of squares and cubes
  • Basic concepts of cube roots and square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study algebraic techniques for solving limits without calculus
  • Learn about the difference of squares and cubes in depth
  • Explore advanced limit problems that require algebraic manipulation
  • Review the properties of cube roots and square roots in functions
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in mastering algebraic techniques for solving limits without relying on calculus methods.

racer
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hello there

Find the lim of this function using Algebra alone and without using
Newton Method or L'Hapital Rule, only Algebraic manipulation is allowed.

I have previously posted this lim but no one did solve it algebriaclly, I solved it using
Algebra and uploaded the solution.

Lim [tex]\frac{^3\sqrt{x}- 4}{\sqrt{x}- 8}[/tex]
X ---> 64

The solution
http://img3.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?ae06b74212.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the update, although I must have missed the original post. It is quite obvious to me that you would want to factor using the difference of two squares/cubes rule as you have 4 (a perfect square) and 8 (a perfect cube). The only thing that might make one hesitate is that instead of using x^2 and x^3 for the numerator and denominator respectively they use x^(1/3) and x(1/2).
 
That's impressive! Of course, using L'Hopital's rule (which, I notice, you are not allowed to do) would make it fairly simple.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K