How to Prove Global Existence for Two-Dimensional Cauchy Problems?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter user40191
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the global existence of solutions for two-dimensional Cauchy problems represented by the differential equation y'(t) = A(t)y(t), where A(t) is a 2x2 matrix with polynomial entries. Participants explore the application of Picard's theorem and the formulation of integral equations to establish conditions for global existence.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using Picard's theorem to show that a solution exists for all t >= 0 by converting the differential equation into an integral equation.
  • Another participant suggests defining a linear transformation based on the integral equation and demonstrating that it is a contraction mapping under certain domain restrictions.
  • A question is raised about the validity of taking the matrix A(t) out of the integral, considering that its entries are functions of t.
  • One participant acknowledges the oversight regarding the dependence of matrix entries on t and corrects the formulation of the integral equation.
  • A later reply introduces the integral equation for general initial conditions and mentions the importance of non-commuting matrices at different times for the solution process.
  • There is a request for clarification on modifying the proof of Picard's theorem for this specific case, indicating some confusion about the complexity of the proof.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement on the approach of using Picard's theorem and integral equations, but there is uncertainty regarding the specifics of the proof and the treatment of the matrix A(t). The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact modifications needed for the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the non-commutativity of matrices at different times, which may complicate the solution process. There is also an acknowledgment of the need for specific conditions on A(t) to ensure global existence, but these conditions are not fully articulated.

user40191
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let y(t) = (y1(t), y2(t))^T and
A(t) = (a(t) b(t)
c(t) d(t)).

A(t) is a 2x2 matrix with a,b,c,d all polynomials in t. Consider the two dimensional Cauchy problem y'(t) = A(t)y(t), y(0)=y0.
Show that a solution exists for all t>=0.
Give a general condition on the A(t) which ensures global existence.

Please could you help me with this question - I don't know what to do. I need to use Picard somewhere I think but I don't know how to go about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, you know the name "Picard" so I presume you have seen the proof- probably for one dimension. Do exactly the same thing: dy/dt= Ay. Convert that to an integral equation by integrating both sides: y= A\int_0^x y(t) dt. Think of that as a "linear transformation", T(y)= A\int_0^x y(t)dt and, just as in the regular "Picard theorem", show that, under restrictions on the domain, that is a "contraction mapping".
 
HallsofIvy said:
Okay, you know the name "Picard" so I presume you have seen the proof- probably for one dimension. Do exactly the same thing: dy/dt= Ay. Convert that to an integral equation by integrating both sides: y= A\int_0^x y(t) dt. Think of that as a "linear transformation", T(y)= A\int_0^x y(t)dt and, just as in the regular "Picard theorem", show that, under restrictions on the domain, that is a "contraction mapping".

Can you take the matrix out of the integral even though its entries are polynomials in t?
 
You are right. I ignored the fact that entries are functions of t. It should be y= \int_0^x A(t)y(t)dt and T(y)= \int_0^x A(t)y(t)dt.
 
For a general initial condition \vec{y}(0)=\vec{y}_0 the integral equation reads
\vec{y}(t)=\vec{y}_0+\int_0^t \mathrm{d} t' \hat{A}(t') \vec{y}(t').
Now you can solve the problem easily by iteration. It's important to keep in mind that in general the matrices \hat{A}(t) do not commute at different times!
 
HallsofIvy said:
You are right. I ignored the fact that entries are functions of t. It should be y= \int_0^x A(t)y(t)dt and T(y)= \int_0^x A(t)y(t)dt.

Would you mind going into a little more depth about how you'd modify the Picard's theorem proof here? I'm a little confused as the version I've seen is really long.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
862
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K