How to recycle effectively (Lip service?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter sophiecentaur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of recycling practices, particularly in the UK and the U.S. Participants express concerns about contamination in recycled materials, the clarity of recycling guidelines provided by local authorities, and the overall efficiency of recycling processes. The conversation touches on theoretical and practical aspects of recycling, including the energy costs associated with cleaning recyclables and the varying standards across different councils.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that up to 20% of recycled waste in the UK ends up in landfill due to contamination, questioning what constitutes contamination.
  • There is uncertainty about how clean recyclables need to be, with some arguing that a simple rinse may suffice, while others suggest that thorough cleaning could waste more energy than it saves.
  • Participants express frustration with the lack of clear recycling instructions from local councils, leading to confusion about what materials can be recycled.
  • Some mention that certain materials, like shredded paper, are unsuitable for recycling but this information is often not communicated effectively by authorities.
  • Concerns are raised about the labor-intensive nature of sorting recyclables, with references to practices in different regions, including hand sorting in Washington state and the use of non-violent prisoners in Pennsylvania.
  • There is a discussion about the energy savings associated with recycling aluminum compared to smelting new aluminum, with some participants advocating for recycling due to its lower energy costs.
  • Some participants reflect on past recycling practices, questioning their efficiency and the rationale behind them, particularly regarding the collection of small amounts of aluminum.
  • There is a debate about the practicality of washing recyclables in terms of water and energy usage, with differing opinions on what constitutes reasonable cleaning standards.
  • Participants express a general sentiment of resentment towards the time spent on recycling, citing a lack of transparency about what happens to recyclables after collection.
  • Some speculate about the financial implications of landfill taxes and how they might influence recycling practices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are significant issues with recycling practices and guidelines, but multiple competing views remain regarding the best methods for cleaning recyclables and the effectiveness of current recycling systems. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the optimal approach to recycling.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include a lack of clarity on what constitutes contamination, varying definitions of cleanliness for recyclables, and the dependence on local authority guidelines that differ across regions. There are unresolved questions about the efficiency and effectiveness of recycling processes.

  • #31
Stephen Tashi said:
it just because people don't follow directions.
We could put it all down to that if the directions were, in fact published consistently. The fact is that the information we are given tends to be more about the days of collection and warnings about putting things in the wrong bins - without being specific what's what.
Andy SV said:
Washing aluminium cans is a waste of time and water
Yep.
Andy SV said:
a glass pot and window glass is not the same stuff at all
Wouldn't you think it would be easy for the council to make that clear? Information is sparse about pretty much everything that the authorities do or want. I guess it's largely down to ignorance on their part - and the fact that most of the public don't read or care about these things.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
sophiecentaur said:
We could put it all down to that if the directions were, in fact published consistently. The fact is that the information we are given tends to be more about the days of collection and warnings about putting things in the wrong bins - without being specific what's what.

In my location in the USA, I can email the recycling company and ask specifics. They answer within a day or so. However, it would be better if I understood the recycling process. For example, I don't understand how the recyclables are separated. What tasks are done "by hand" and what tasks are automated?
 
  • #33
sophiecentaur said:
<Snip>

Yep.
Wouldn't you think it would be easy for the council to make that clear? Information is sparse about pretty much everything that the authorities do or want. I guess it's largely down to ignorance on their part - and the fact that most of the public don't read or care about these things.
And it is harder then for people in general to care when they see the proponents of the project do not seem to.
 
  • #34
Stephen Tashi said:
However, it would be better if I understood the recycling process.
Same here. BUT we a 'special' and that doesn't apply to many members of the public; it's a PF type of thing. People need stuff spelled out to them (just consider how people like their cooking recipes; what to do, not why). I despair sometimes. :H
WWGD said:
And it is harder then for people in general to care when they see the proponents of the project do not seem to.
That's life. I suppose the only way to change things os to get involved with local town politics and take on the responsibility of whatever it is that winds you up worst.
 
  • #35
I think it's fun to recycle directly. I have used cans for shims and gallon glass jugs are awesome for sun tea. Cereal boxes can make a nice gasket. An empty bag of chips or crisps may or may not have become a vacuum diaphragm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #36
Andy SV said:
I think it's fun to recycle directly. I have used cans for shims and gallon glass jugs are awesome for sun tea. Cereal boxes can make a nice gasket. An empty bag of chips or crisps may or may not have become a vacuum diaphragm.
There is nothing that cannot be used for anything else. My shed is full of reusable (and actually reused) items. I was very pleased to be able to mend the mechanism for lifting the sink plug in our bathroom when the lifting lever had corroded and fallen to pieces, yesterday. An old screwdriver shaft was just the right size to fit. There is no way I could have found a replacement bit in a shop. I would likely have had to buy a whole new sink and taps. All it cost me was a smear of epoxy resin to fix the ball seal. My Dad showed me how to use a cereal packet to replace a car water pump gasket, way back in the 60s. Not so easy to do that sort of thing these days with cars, though.
 
  • #37
Andy SV said:
I think it's fun to recycle directly. I have used cans for shims and gallon glass jugs are awesome for sun tea. Cereal boxes can make a nice gasket. An empty bag of chips or crisps may or may not have become a vacuum diaphragm.
You can go further while showering. Get yourself just wet-enough, turn off the water, put soap on yourself, then rinse off and done. I estimate a saving of some 60%. EDIT: Not strictly recycling, more like pre-cycling, i.e., using less to start with..
 
  • #38
I have a small tub and I like some relaxing rub a dub dub
Plus I water with it
 
  • #39
Andy SV said:
I have a small tub and I like some relaxing rub a dub dub
Plus I water with it
Sorry, it was intended for all other than fairy-tale characters ;).
 
  • #40
WWGD said:
You can go further while showering. Get yourself just wet-enough, turn off the water, put soap on yourself, then rinse off and done. I estimate a saving of some 60%. EDIT: Not strictly recycling, more like pre-cycling, i.e., using less to start with..
Can there be any other way? If the shower is on constantly, all the shower gel washes off before you can 'scrub'.
 
  • #41
sophiecentaur said:
Can there be any other way? If the shower is on constantly, all the shower gel washes off before you can 'scrub'.
You can always leave certain parts of your body of the water in the process or expose it only lightly. Sort of like the way people wash their hands while leaving the water full-on.
 
  • #42
WWGD said:
You can always leave certain parts of your body of the water in the process or expose it only lightly. Sort of like the way people wash their hands while leaving the water full-on.
True - if you have a large shower cubicle. Ours is too small to escape the jets unless you point it at the wall. I can't bring myself to be so wasteful. Washing hands under a running tap can waste an awful lot of water.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #43
sophiecentaur said:
True - if you have a large shower cubicle. Ours is too small to escape the jets unless you point it at the wall. I can't bring myself to be so wasteful. Washing hands under a running tap can waste an awful lot of water.
I cringe when I see some people leaving the water running at full speed while brushing their teeth. I just wet it before and after. But it seems socially out-of-line to say anything. I am not that socially adroit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #44
I would like to see self shutting taps
Ones that wold slowly turn off in about three seconds but had an option to lock on by pulling up
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #45
WWGD said:
I cringe when I see some people leaving the water running at full speed while brushing their teeth. I just wet it before and after. But it seems socially out-of-line to say anything. I am not that socially adroit.
You have our full permission to be as grumpy about it as you like. I have been telling my wife about that for forty years+ and she seldom remembers.
Andy SV said:
I would like to see self shutting taps
Ones that wold slowly turn off in about three seconds but had an option to lock on by pulling up
Those taps that need constant pushing are totally useless for hand washing and the plug is always missing in pubs!
 
  • #46
sophiecentaur said:
You have our full permission to be as grumpy about it as you like. I have been telling my wife about that for forty years+ and she seldom remembers.
A happy ending to this story. She now takes great care about running taps.
AditiSharma said:
Let's keep working together to ensure that our efforts to recycle are making a positive impact on the environment
I am not optimistic about this or anything else about our environment, aamof. People, and the people they elect to be politicians, are incapable of thinking ahead. Their decisions are based on today's pleasure, rather than tomorrow's repercussions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #47
sophiecentaur said:
I am not optimistic about this or anything else about our environment, aamof. People, and the people they elect to be politicians, are incapable of thinking ahead. Their decisions are based on today's pleasure, rather than tomorrow's repercussions.
I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that we are now effectively entrenched (as a world society) into an unsustainable way of life. Sometime in the past 40 years there needed to be a complete sea-change in perspective of our place in the natural world. To resolve as a world community not to destroy the conditions that sustain human life. That hasn't happened.

If we reran recent history 100 times would it ever have happened? Or, is the destruction of our environment an inevitable consequence of some fundamental weakness as a species? Despite our intelligence and the apparent possibility of action, we seem like helpless animals, unable to stop ourselves over-consuming.
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
10K