B How to relate relativistic kinetic energy and momentum

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the correct graph for relativistic momentum as a function of relativistic kinetic energy. Initial attempts to express momentum in terms of kinetic energy using the equations for momentum and kinetic energy were unsuccessful without an additional relationship. Participants confirmed that the Lorentz factor, gamma (γ), relates to velocity (v) and can be used to derive expressions for momentum and kinetic energy in terms of velocity. The equation relating energy and momentum was also introduced, leading to the conclusion that the correct graph is C, as it aligns with the derived relationship for momentum in terms of kinetic energy. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between these relativistic quantities.
greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Hi guys,

a special relativity problem requested to choose the right graph representing relativistic momentum ##p## as a function of rel. kinetic energy ##K##, from these four:
IMG_C89C1901D709-1.jpeg
At first, I tried writing ##p## as a function of ##K##, in order to then analyze the function's graph and see if it matches one of the four above, being ##p=\gamma mv## and ##K=mc^2(\gamma - 1)##, but I couldn't rearrange those two in such a way.
By deduction, I believe the graph should be C or D, since momentum would reasonably tend to infinity in a non-linear way(A) due to the presence of factor ##\gamma##, nor as indicated by B...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have an equation for ##p(\gamma, v)## and an equation for ##K(\gamma)##, so of course, you cannot use them to find an equation ##p(K)##, you need an extra equation, do you know of any equation that relates ##\gamma## and ##v##?
 
Gaussian97 said:
You have an equation for ##p(\gamma, v)## and an equation for ##K(\gamma)##, so of course, you cannot use them to find an equation ##p(K)##, you need an extra equation, do you know of any equation that relates ##\gamma## and ##v##?
Aren't ##\gamma## and ##v## simply related by ##\gamma##'s definition ##\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}##, being ##\beta## the velocity in terms of ##c##?
 
greg_rack said:
Aren't ##\gamma## and ##v## simply related by ##\gamma##'s definition ##\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}##, being ##\beta## the velocity in terms of ##c##?
Yes. So you should be able to write ##p(v)## and ##K(v)## and hence ##K(p)##.

Alternatively, do you know anything about ##E^2## and ##p^2c^2##?
 
  • Like
Likes greg_rack
Ibix said:
Alternatively, do you know anything about ##E^2## and ##p^2c^2##?
Yes, ##E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^{4}##.
Rearranging, it indeed gets ##p(E)=\frac{1}{c}\sqrt{E^2-E_0^2}##, hence:
$$p(K)=\frac{1}{c}\sqrt{K(K+2E_0)}$$
which corresponds to graph C :)
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and PeroK
I've been thinking some more about the Hawking - Penrose Singularity theorem and was wondering if you could help me gain a better understanding of the assumptions they made when they wrote it, in 1970. In Hawking's book, A Brief History of Time (chapter 3, page 25) he writes.... In 1965 I read about Penrose’s theorem that any body undergoing gravitational collapse must eventually form a singularity. I soon realized that if one reversed the direction of time in Penrose’s theorem, so that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K