How to relate relativistic kinetic energy and momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the relationship between relativistic momentum (p) and kinetic energy (K) using special relativity principles. Participants confirm that momentum is expressed as p = γmv and kinetic energy as K = mc²(γ - 1). By utilizing the equation E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, they successfully derive the equation p(K) = (1/c)√(K(K + 2E₀)), identifying graph C as the correct representation of this relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly relativistic momentum and kinetic energy.
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz factor, γ = 1/√(1 - β²), where β is the velocity as a fraction of the speed of light (c).
  • Knowledge of the energy-momentum relation, E² = p²c² + m²c⁴.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations involving square roots and variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz factor and its implications in relativistic physics.
  • Explore the energy-momentum relation in greater detail, focusing on its applications in particle physics.
  • Learn about graphical representations of physical relationships in relativistic contexts.
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic effects on high-speed particles in accelerators.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on special relativity, as well as researchers and professionals working in fields involving high-energy particle physics.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Hi guys,

a special relativity problem requested to choose the right graph representing relativistic momentum ##p## as a function of rel. kinetic energy ##K##, from these four:
IMG_C89C1901D709-1.jpeg
At first, I tried writing ##p## as a function of ##K##, in order to then analyze the function's graph and see if it matches one of the four above, being ##p=\gamma mv## and ##K=mc^2(\gamma - 1)##, but I couldn't rearrange those two in such a way.
By deduction, I believe the graph should be C or D, since momentum would reasonably tend to infinity in a non-linear way(A) due to the presence of factor ##\gamma##, nor as indicated by B...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have an equation for ##p(\gamma, v)## and an equation for ##K(\gamma)##, so of course, you cannot use them to find an equation ##p(K)##, you need an extra equation, do you know of any equation that relates ##\gamma## and ##v##?
 
Gaussian97 said:
You have an equation for ##p(\gamma, v)## and an equation for ##K(\gamma)##, so of course, you cannot use them to find an equation ##p(K)##, you need an extra equation, do you know of any equation that relates ##\gamma## and ##v##?
Aren't ##\gamma## and ##v## simply related by ##\gamma##'s definition ##\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}##, being ##\beta## the velocity in terms of ##c##?
 
greg_rack said:
Aren't ##\gamma## and ##v## simply related by ##\gamma##'s definition ##\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}##, being ##\beta## the velocity in terms of ##c##?
Yes. So you should be able to write ##p(v)## and ##K(v)## and hence ##K(p)##.

Alternatively, do you know anything about ##E^2## and ##p^2c^2##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack
Ibix said:
Alternatively, do you know anything about ##E^2## and ##p^2c^2##?
Yes, ##E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^{4}##.
Rearranging, it indeed gets ##p(E)=\frac{1}{c}\sqrt{E^2-E_0^2}##, hence:
$$p(K)=\frac{1}{c}\sqrt{K(K+2E_0)}$$
which corresponds to graph C :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
852
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K