How to Reproduce the \mathring{} Symbol in Mathtype?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisHarvey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathtype Symbol
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenge of reproducing the \mathring{} symbol in Mathtype for use in MS Word, particularly for academic writing. Participants explore various methods and alternatives to achieve a satisfactory representation of this notation, which was originally typeset in LaTeX.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Chris describes difficulties in reproducing the notation a_{\mathring{i}jk} in Mathtype, noting that alternatives do not meet his needs.
  • Some participants suggest importing equations as embedded PDF files or high-resolution images as a workaround, although this may complicate editing.
  • Bob offers a solution involving downloading an attached GIF and opening it in MathType, implying it may help with the notation issue.
  • Chris expresses gratitude for a solution that works well and is editable, asking for further clarification on the method used.
  • Another participant explains the use of the subscript template and "nudging" to align characters correctly, detailing steps to achieve the desired notation.
  • Participants discuss the potential for adding additional subscripts and modifying the notation as needed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on a single solution, as participants explore multiple approaches and share different methods to address the notation issue.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations related to the compatibility of Mathtype with LaTeX and the challenges of maintaining editable formats in Word.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals working on academic writing in MS Word who need to replicate complex mathematical notation originally created in LaTeX, particularly those using Mathtype.

ChrisHarvey
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
For various reasons, I have to rewrite part of my thesis in MS Word and Mathtype, after I wrote it in LaTeX. I used some notation in LaTeX from the amsmath package, which I'm finding very hard to reproduce satisfactorily in Mathtype.

Take a look at the attached image. On the left there is a_{\mathring{i}jk}, which is typeset perfectly by LaTeX. The middle and right show the best alternatives I can find in Mathtype. The middle one just has a dot, which is very hard to see when printed and is actually different notation to what I want. The right one has the subscripts shifted down, which looks really ugly, especially when presented alongside with terms with no rings over subscripts (when it is really obvious).

Does anyone know if there is a way to reproduce this notation correctly in Mathtype? I'm using Mathtype 6, which is partially compatible with LaTeX equations. I was hoping there was a way to import LaTeX packages, but I guess that's overly optimistic? ...or maybe there's another way to draw the symbol?

Thanks for any help,
Regards,
Chris
 

Attachments

  • Options.png
    Options.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 802
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no experience with Mathtype, and have not used Word in some time. That said, would it be possible (and feasible) to import your equations as little imbedded .PDF files, or at least high resolution images? It would probably be a huge mess, but it would ensure your typesetting is still good.

If your Word version will not be the final version to go to print, maybe you could just get by with ugly notation?
 
The word version will not be the final version to print --- this is just the manuscript which will be submitted as a MS Word doc. I guess I could just put up with the ugly notation, like you suggest. At least it's clear (unlike the 'dotted' subscript). That's preferable to dumping them in as images, since part of the point of me writing it in Word is so my advisor can edit bits, if he wants to (he doesn't use LaTeX).

Any other suggestions are still welcome!

Cheers.
 
ChrisHarvey said:
Take a look at the attached image. On the left there is a_{\mathring{i}jk}, which is typeset perfectly by LaTeX. The middle and right show the best alternatives I can find in Mathtype...

Does anyone know if there is a way to reproduce this notation correctly in Mathtype?

Chris, you should be able to download the attached GIF and open it in MathType. See if this will work for you.

Bob
 

Attachments

  • a_mathring.gif
    a_mathring.gif
    601 bytes · Views: 818
Sorry for the delayed reply. I've been away for a few days.

That works perfectly... thanks so much! It's completely editable and correctly aligned. How did you do that?

EDIT: Sometimes I need to add a fourth subscript and/or add the ring to different subscripts. That's why I'm asking for more information. Still tinkering with the file trying to work out what you did...
 
Last edited:
ChrisHarvey said:
That works perfectly... thanks so much! It's completely editable and correctly aligned. How did you do that?

I used the subscript template, then used "nudging" to move the characters where I wanted them. (You can search MathType Help for "nudging" to find out how to do it.)

Within the subscript, I used the "Overscript" template from the "Subscript and superscript templates" palette. The i is in the lower slot of the overscript, and the "Composition" symbol from the Operator Symbols palette is in the upper slot. Press Tab to get out of the overscript template, then type the jk. Select the entire subscript and nudge it up into position, then select the composition symbol and nudge it down. If you want a fourth subscript, just add it at the appropriate time. Likewise, if you need the ring over a different variable.

You can see the extent of the nudging by choosing View > Show Nesting. If you want to reset the nudging and have the characters go back to the original positions, select it, and choose Format > Reset Nudge.

Also note that if you need to change any of the variables, MathType thinks they're still in their original positions. This makes it difficult to click and select one of them. The Tab key is the easiest way to position the insertion point (cursor) near one of the characters.
 
That's great. It's all working now. Thanks very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
23K