How to select the good basis for the special Hamiltonian?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Hamiltonian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on selecting an appropriate basis for the Hamiltonian defined as H=\frac{P^2}{2\mu} -\frac{Ze^2}{r}+ \frac{\alpha}{r^3} L.S. It establishes that the third term, \frac{\alpha}{r^3} L.S, commutes with the sum of the first two terms, \frac{P^2}{2\mu} -\frac{Ze^2}{r}, leading to the conclusion that the operators J^2, J_z, L^2, and S^2 form the optimal basis. The transition from quantum numbers n, l, m_l to n, l, s, j, m_j upon including spin-orbit coupling is also clarified, emphasizing the conservation of total angular momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and Hamiltonians
  • Familiarity with angular momentum operators J^2, J_z, L^2, and S^2
  • Knowledge of spin and spin-orbit coupling concepts
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation used in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the commutation relations of quantum mechanical operators
  • Learn about the implications of spin-orbit coupling in quantum systems
  • Explore the role of quantum numbers in the context of Hamiltonians
  • Investigate the mathematical framework of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers focusing on Hamiltonian systems and angular momentum in quantum theory.

hokhani
Messages
601
Reaction score
22
How to select the good basis for the special Hamiltonian??

For the Hamiltonian [itex]H=\frac{P^2}{2\mu} -\frac{Ze^2}{r}+ \frac{\alpha}{r^3} L.S[/itex] (which we can use [itex]L.S=\frac{1}{2} (J^2-L^2-S^2)[/itex]in the third term) how to realize that the third term,[itex]\frac{\alpha}{r^3} L.S[/itex], commutes with sum of the first two terms,[itex]\frac{P^2}{2\mu} -\frac{Ze^2}{r}[/itex], and then conclude that the set of the operators [itex]J^2, J_z, L^2, S^2[/itex] are the best to work with? ([itex]\alpha, Z, e, \mu[/itex] are constants)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually, you arrive at it by steps. You first have the Hamiltonian in the absence of spin, from which you find that you have quantum numbers ##n##, ##l##, and ##m_l##, the latter usually chosen to be the projection along z. When you add spin, you find that the Hamiltonian is independent of spin, so you describe the eigenstates with
$$
\left| n, l, m_l, s, m_s \right\rangle
$$

When you add spin-orbit coupling, you realize that ##m_l## and ##m_s## are no longer good quantum numbers (conserved quantities), and you try to figure out what is still conserved. the total angular momentum ##j## and its projection ##m_j## are, so you switch to
$$
\left| n, l, s, j, m_j \right\rangle
$$

Note that ##j## and ##m_j## were already good quantum numbers, but since they are redundant with ##l##, ##m_l##, ##s##, and ##m_s## in the absence of spin-orbit coupling, they are not explicitely mentionned.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
423
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K