How to Simplify a Summation with Unknown Last Term?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohabitar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a summation that includes an unknown last term, specifically focusing on the interpretation of the summation's structure and the implications of the last term, denoted as k=n.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of the last term in the summation and question how to express the summation in closed form. There are attempts to break down the summation into parts, with some confusion about the correct limits of summation and the necessity of including the last term as a separate entity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants attempting to clarify the structure of the summation and the role of the last term. Some guidance has been offered regarding the separation of terms and the limits of summation, but there remains uncertainty about the correct approach and interpretation.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the requirements of the problem and the implications of the last term, indicating a need for further clarification on the problem's expectations.

mohabitar
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
xnkMQ.png


I'm having a hard time understanding what this question is even asking for. Do I just write this summation in closed form? What does it mean by its last term, or the k=n term? I know I'm supposed to have at least attempted the problem, but I honestly have no idea what this question is even asking from me to begin with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a finite sum with (n - 3) + 1 terms. All they're asking for is a summation consisting of the first n - 3 terms + the last term; i.e., the term when k = n.

To get the first summation, the index k should run from k = 3 to k = ?
 
to k=n-1? And the 2nd summation would just be for the actual value of n, correct? But there are two parts to this right? First break it up into its two parts, then write a summation that contains everything but its last term, so that would be everything from k=n-1.
 
Here's what I got so far:
Am I done? What else are they asking for?

4wWxZ.jpg
 
mohabitar said:
to k=n-1? And the 2nd summation would just be for the actual value of n, correct? But there are two parts to this right? First break it up into its two parts, then write a summation that contains everything but its last term, so that would be everything from k=n-1.
Everything from k = 3 to k = n - 1. There isn't really a second summation - you could write it as a summation, but it consists of just a single term, so writing it in summation form is overkill.
 
In your reply with the scan, you aren't getting it. The last term part should not be written as a summation. It is a single term.

The "remaining terms" part is wrong. Your summation represents only the last two terms of the original summation. It should include the first term, second term, ..., (n - 1)st term.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K