MHB How would you show this summation is greater than 24 without induction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality $\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4k+1}+\sqrt{4k+3}}>24$ without using induction. Participants suggest rationalizing the denominator and transforming the sum into a form involving square roots, leading to the expression $\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)$. A proof by induction is outlined, establishing a hypothesis that connects the sums to a simpler form, ultimately demonstrating that the sum exceeds 24. Additionally, an alternative approach using geometric properties of square roots is mentioned, emphasizing the convexity of the function. The conversation highlights various methods to tackle the inequality, showcasing mathematical creativity and problem-solving techniques.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
On another site, a user asked for help showing:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{2499} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4k+1}+\sqrt{4k+3}}>24$

The first respondent asked if the OP was familiar with mathematical induction. The reply was that induction was the topic of the next chapter in her course.

Another suggested rationalizing the denominator to write:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>24$

and then wished the OP good luck. She then asked for further help. She also asked for a proof by induction, which I provided as follows:

If I were going to use induction, I would state the hypothesis:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^n\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{n+1}-1$

or equivalently:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\sqrt{n+1}-2$ where $\displaystyle n\in\mathbb{N}_0$

base case $\displaystyle P_0$:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^0\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\sqrt{0+1}-2$

$\displaystyle \sqrt{3}-\sqrt{1}>1-2$ true.

Consider:

$\displaystyle 6n+9=2\left(3n+\frac{9}{2} \right)$

$\displaystyle 6n+9=2\left(2(2n+3)-\frac{2n+3}{2} \right)$

$\displaystyle 6n+9=2\left(\sqrt{4(2n+3)^2}-\sqrt{\frac{(2n+3)^2}{4}} \right)$

$\displaystyle 6n+9>2\left(\sqrt{4(2n+3)^2-1}-\sqrt{\frac{(2n+3)^2+4n+3}{4}} \right)$

$\displaystyle 6n+9>2\left(\sqrt{(4n+5)(4n+7)}-\sqrt{(n+1)(n+3)} \right)$

$\displaystyle 8n+12-2\sqrt{(4n+5)(4n+7)}>2n+3-2\sqrt{(n+1)(n+3)}$

$\displaystyle (4n+7)-2\sqrt{(4n+5)(4n+7)}+(4n+5)>(n+2)-2\sqrt{(n+1)(n+3)}+(n+1)$

$\displaystyle (\sqrt{4n+7}-\sqrt{4n+5})^2>(\sqrt{n+2}-\sqrt{n+1})^2$

$\displaystyle \sqrt{4n+7}-\sqrt{4n+5}>\sqrt{n+2}-\sqrt{n+1}$

$\displaystyle \sqrt{4(n+1)+3}-\sqrt{4(n+1)+1}>\sqrt{(n+1)+1}-\sqrt{n+1}$

Now, adding this to the hypothesis, we have:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)+\sqrt{4(n+1)+3}-\sqrt{4(n+1)+1}>\sqrt{n+1}-2+\sqrt{(n+1)+1}-\sqrt{n+1}$

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{n+1}\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\sqrt{(n+1)+1}-2$

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{n+1}\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{(n+1)+1}-1$

We have derived $\displaystyle P_{n+1}$ from $\displaystyle P_n$, thereby completing the proof by induction, and we may now state:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499}\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{2500}-1=24$

Another person replied with a technique using integration, which I am sure will be of little use to the OP.

I am just curious if there is a way to demonstrate the inequality is true by purely algebraic means. This is just for my own curiosity, and I will not post anyone's work there.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
MarkFL said:
On another site, a user asked for help showing:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{2499} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4k+1}+\sqrt{4k+3}}>24$

The first respondent asked if the OP was familiar with mathematical induction. The reply was that induction was the topic of the next chapter in her course.

Another suggested rationalizing the denominator to write:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>24$
My starting point is the inequality $$\sqrt x > \tfrac12\bigl(\sqrt{x+\alpha}+\sqrt{x-\alpha}\bigr)\qquad (0<\alpha < x)\qquad(*).$$ Geometrically, this is an obvious consequence of the fact that the graph of the square root function is convex downwards, as in this picture:

[graph]jcs7w6tdh4[/graph]​

To verify (*) algebraically, square both sides so that it becomes $x > \frac14\bigl(2x +2\sqrt{x^2-\alpha^2}\bigr)$. This simplifies to $x>\sqrt{x^2-\alpha^2}$ which is obviously true.

Next, check that (*) can be written in the equivalent form $\sqrt x - \sqrt{x-\alpha} >\tfrac12\bigl(\sqrt{x+\alpha}-\sqrt {x-\alpha}\bigr).$ Now put $x=k+\frac34$ and $\alpha=\frac12$, to get $\sqrt{k+\frac34} - \sqrt{k+\frac14} >\tfrac12\bigl(\sqrt{k+\frac54}-\sqrt {k+\frac14}\bigr).$

Therefore $$\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4k+1}+\sqrt{4k+3}} = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right) = \sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{k+\tfrac34}-\sqrt{k+\tfrac14} \right) > \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{k+\tfrac54}-\sqrt{k+\tfrac14} \right).$$ That is a telescoping sum which collapses to $\frac12\Bigl(\sqrt{2500\tfrac14} - \sqrt{\tfrac14}\Bigr) > \frac12\bigl(50 - \tfrac12\bigr) = 24.75.$
 
MarkFL said:
If I were going to use induction, I would state the hypothesis:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^n\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{n+1}-1$
How did you get the RHS?
 
I noticed the partial sums of the LHS followed the curve $\displaystyle y=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{x}$ very closely, so I wrote 24 in that form.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top