How would you show this summation is greater than 24 without induction?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Summation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating the inequality $\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{2499} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4k+1}+\sqrt{4k+3}}>24$ without using mathematical induction. Participants explore various mathematical techniques, including algebraic manipulation and geometric interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose rationalizing the denominator to rewrite the summation as $\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)$.
  • One participant suggests using a geometric interpretation of a related inequality involving square roots, asserting that $\sqrt x > \tfrac12\bigl(\sqrt{x+\alpha}+\sqrt{x-\alpha}\bigr)$ holds due to the convex nature of the square root function.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about demonstrating the inequality through purely algebraic means, indicating a desire to explore alternative approaches.
  • A participant questions the derivation of the right-hand side of an induction hypothesis presented by another, seeking clarification on the reasoning behind it.
  • One participant notes that the partial sums of the left-hand side appear to closely follow the curve $\displaystyle y=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{x}$, which leads to a numerical approximation of 24.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and interpretations, but there is no consensus on a single approach to demonstrate the inequality without induction. Multiple competing views and techniques remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments depend on specific assumptions about the properties of square roots and the behavior of summations, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and interpretations.

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
On another site, a user asked for help showing:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{2499} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4k+1}+\sqrt{4k+3}}>24$

The first respondent asked if the OP was familiar with mathematical induction. The reply was that induction was the topic of the next chapter in her course.

Another suggested rationalizing the denominator to write:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>24$

and then wished the OP good luck. She then asked for further help. She also asked for a proof by induction, which I provided as follows:

If I were going to use induction, I would state the hypothesis:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^n\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{n+1}-1$

or equivalently:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\sqrt{n+1}-2$ where $\displaystyle n\in\mathbb{N}_0$

base case $\displaystyle P_0$:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^0\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\sqrt{0+1}-2$

$\displaystyle \sqrt{3}-\sqrt{1}>1-2$ true.

Consider:

$\displaystyle 6n+9=2\left(3n+\frac{9}{2} \right)$

$\displaystyle 6n+9=2\left(2(2n+3)-\frac{2n+3}{2} \right)$

$\displaystyle 6n+9=2\left(\sqrt{4(2n+3)^2}-\sqrt{\frac{(2n+3)^2}{4}} \right)$

$\displaystyle 6n+9>2\left(\sqrt{4(2n+3)^2-1}-\sqrt{\frac{(2n+3)^2+4n+3}{4}} \right)$

$\displaystyle 6n+9>2\left(\sqrt{(4n+5)(4n+7)}-\sqrt{(n+1)(n+3)} \right)$

$\displaystyle 8n+12-2\sqrt{(4n+5)(4n+7)}>2n+3-2\sqrt{(n+1)(n+3)}$

$\displaystyle (4n+7)-2\sqrt{(4n+5)(4n+7)}+(4n+5)>(n+2)-2\sqrt{(n+1)(n+3)}+(n+1)$

$\displaystyle (\sqrt{4n+7}-\sqrt{4n+5})^2>(\sqrt{n+2}-\sqrt{n+1})^2$

$\displaystyle \sqrt{4n+7}-\sqrt{4n+5}>\sqrt{n+2}-\sqrt{n+1}$

$\displaystyle \sqrt{4(n+1)+3}-\sqrt{4(n+1)+1}>\sqrt{(n+1)+1}-\sqrt{n+1}$

Now, adding this to the hypothesis, we have:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)+\sqrt{4(n+1)+3}-\sqrt{4(n+1)+1}>\sqrt{n+1}-2+\sqrt{(n+1)+1}-\sqrt{n+1}$

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{n+1}\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\sqrt{(n+1)+1}-2$

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{n+1}\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{(n+1)+1}-1$

We have derived $\displaystyle P_{n+1}$ from $\displaystyle P_n$, thereby completing the proof by induction, and we may now state:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499}\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{2500}-1=24$

Another person replied with a technique using integration, which I am sure will be of little use to the OP.

I am just curious if there is a way to demonstrate the inequality is true by purely algebraic means. This is just for my own curiosity, and I will not post anyone's work there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarkFL said:
On another site, a user asked for help showing:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{2499} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4k+1}+\sqrt{4k+3}}>24$

The first respondent asked if the OP was familiar with mathematical induction. The reply was that induction was the topic of the next chapter in her course.

Another suggested rationalizing the denominator to write:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>24$
My starting point is the inequality $$\sqrt x > \tfrac12\bigl(\sqrt{x+\alpha}+\sqrt{x-\alpha}\bigr)\qquad (0<\alpha < x)\qquad(*).$$ Geometrically, this is an obvious consequence of the fact that the graph of the square root function is convex downwards, as in this picture:

[graph]jcs7w6tdh4[/graph]​

To verify (*) algebraically, square both sides so that it becomes $x > \frac14\bigl(2x +2\sqrt{x^2-\alpha^2}\bigr)$. This simplifies to $x>\sqrt{x^2-\alpha^2}$ which is obviously true.

Next, check that (*) can be written in the equivalent form $\sqrt x - \sqrt{x-\alpha} >\tfrac12\bigl(\sqrt{x+\alpha}-\sqrt {x-\alpha}\bigr).$ Now put $x=k+\frac34$ and $\alpha=\frac12$, to get $\sqrt{k+\frac34} - \sqrt{k+\frac14} >\tfrac12\bigl(\sqrt{k+\frac54}-\sqrt {k+\frac14}\bigr).$

Therefore $$\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4k+1}+\sqrt{4k+3}} = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right) = \sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{k+\tfrac34}-\sqrt{k+\tfrac14} \right) > \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^{2499} \left(\sqrt{k+\tfrac54}-\sqrt{k+\tfrac14} \right).$$ That is a telescoping sum which collapses to $\frac12\Bigl(\sqrt{2500\tfrac14} - \sqrt{\tfrac14}\Bigr) > \frac12\bigl(50 - \tfrac12\bigr) = 24.75.$
 
MarkFL said:
If I were going to use induction, I would state the hypothesis:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=0}^n\left(\sqrt{4k+3}-\sqrt{4k+1} \right)>\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{n+1}-1$
How did you get the RHS?
 
I noticed the partial sums of the LHS followed the curve $\displaystyle y=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{x}$ very closely, so I wrote 24 in that form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
501
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K