Hubble down, Repair mission delayed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Integral
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hubble
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the operational status of the Hubble Space Telescope following an electrical malfunction and the subsequent delay of its repair mission. Participants explore the implications of these developments on Hubble's capabilities and future missions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Hubble has resumed operations after a period of dormancy due to an electrical malfunction.
  • Others highlight that NASA has announced a delay in the repair mission, which is now pushed back to at least May, affecting the timeline for upgrades to the telescope.
  • It is mentioned that the new router unit needed for the repairs will not be ready in time for the previously hoped-for February launch.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of the delay on the Ares test flight, as reported by certain news outlets.
  • There are conflicting reports regarding the current capabilities of Hubble, with some stating that while the Advanced Camera for Surveys is operational, it is limited to ultraviolet light.
  • Concerns are raised about the possibility of the repair mission being canceled if the necessary equipment cannot be prepared adequately.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the implications of Hubble's operational status and the repair mission's delay. There is no consensus on the potential outcomes of these developments.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various news sources for updates on Hubble's status and the repair mission, indicating a reliance on external reporting for information. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the timeline and technical challenges involved in the repair process.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in space exploration, astronomy, and the operational status of space telescopes may find this discussion relevant.

Integral
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
7,232
Reaction score
66
Due to a http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.hubble30sep30,0,7125042.story" , Hubble has been silenced.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well that just sucks.
 
NASA Releases New Hubble Picture.
NASA released a picture, often described as "stunning," to show that the telescope was up and running again. At the same conference, NASA announced the needed repair unit would not be ready until at least May, delaying the last repair mission until then. Most articles mention both topics. Only the Orlando Sentinel and the AP mention that this delay will hold up the Ares test flight as well.

ABC World News (10/30, story 7, :15, Gibson) reported, "The Hubble space telescope is up and running again, and capturing breathtaking new images. The 18-year-old telescope just sent back this picture of two ring-shaped galaxies what you're looking at is 440 million light-years from Earth."

The New York Times (10/31, Overbye) website reports, "After an electrical malfunction caused it to go dormant a month ago, the Hubble Space Telescope is back in business. But the space shuttle mission to repair and upgrade the Hubble has been pushed back again, NASA officials said Thursday." NASA released an image of the pair of galaxies known as Arp 174 from the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 to show it is operating. "According to Mario Livio, of the space telescope institute, one of the galaxies passed through the other, causing a circular wave." The new router unit for the Hubble "would not be ready for a hoped-for February launching, and...the mission would be pushed back to May."

The Washington Post (10/31, A8, Kaufman) quotes Hubble program manager Preston Burch as saying that "the newly restored capabilities on the Hubble should hold up until astronauts can reach the observatory next year." The Space Telescope Science Institute called the image a "perfect 10" and was the equal of those taken before the system shut down. "The Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys is also working again but is able to pick up only ultraviolet light, said Space Telescope Institute spokesman Ray Villard. The visible light capability went out a while ago." According to the Post, the issue with the router "is significant enough that NASA's Astrophysics Division Director Jon Morse said it is possible that the repair...mission would be scrubbed if the third formatter cannot be brought up to specifications. But he said he remains confident that the instrument...will be fully restored."

The Baltimore Sun (10/31, Roylance) reports, "The new Hubble image of Arp 147 was taken Monday and Tuesday, combining three separate images made with different filters." The AP (10/31) reports that another camera "still needs time before it can start running again, but it should be working by early next month, Villard said."

NASA said:
Just a couple of days after the orbiting observatory was brought back online, Hubble aimed its prime working camera, the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2), at a particularly intriguing target, a pair of gravitationally interacting galaxies called Arp 147.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hst_img_20081030.html

NASA Managers Delay Hubble Servicing Mission
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2008/oct/HQ_08-280_HST_Delay.html
WASHINGTON -- NASA managers have announced that they will not meet a February 2009 launch date for the fifth and final shuttle mission to the Hubble Space Telescope. The decision comes after engineers completed assessments of the work needed to get a second data handling unit for the telescope ready to fly. The unit will replace one that failed on Hubble in late September, causing the agency to postpone the servicing mission, which had been targeted for Oct. 14.

"We now have done enough analysis of all the things that need to happen with the flight spare unit to know that we cannot be ready for a February launch," said NASA's Astrophysics Division Director Jon Morse at NASA Headquarters in Washington. "The February date was an initial estimate, assuming minimal hardware preparations and test durations that are no longer viewed as realistic. We've communicated our assessment to the Space Shuttle Program so it can adjust near-term plans. We will work closely with the Shuttle Program to develop details for a new launch opportunity."
. . . .
 
Thanks for that very nice link, Astronuc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K