Hubble Expansion: Moon Orbital Distance & Error Check

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter John Richard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Hubble
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Hubble expansion coefficient to the distance between the Earth and the Moon, specifically questioning the validity of this application for relatively close orbital distances and the implications of error in distance measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • John questions whether it is valid to apply the Hubble constant to the Earth-Moon distance, given that he calculates a different rate of increase in distance compared to NASA's measurements.
  • Wallace argues that applying the Hubble expansion on such scales is not valid due to the nature of bound structures and the idealized homogeneous Universe that the Hubble result assumes.
  • John acknowledges Wallace's input and later finds additional information suggesting that the Moon's increasing distance is related to tidal forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of applying the Hubble constant to the Earth-Moon distance, with differing views presented. John appears to accept Wallace's argument regarding the inapplicability of the Hubble expansion for bound structures.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in applying cosmological principles to local astronomical phenomena, particularly regarding the assumptions of homogeneity and density in the Universe.

John Richard
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Hello,
A couple of questions:
The distance to the moon is calculated as increasing by 38 millimetres per year by the laser ranging work of NASA following Apollo 11.

When I apply the Hubble expansion coeficient to the centre to centre distance from Earth to the Moon, I get just over 28 millimetres per year relative to todays measured distance.

Firstly, is it valid to apply the Hubble constant to relatively close orbitals in this manner?

Secondly, if it is valid, is there sufficient error in the centre to cenre distance being stated as an average of 385,000Km to compensate for the difference, (38 to 28)?

I am of course checking my maths.

Thanks for any help

John
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, it isn't valid to apply the Hubble expansion on these scales, it's not that the expansion term is small but because the Hubble result applies to an idealized homogeneous Universe as therefore does not work for bound structures that are thousands of times more dense than the mean density.

I remember learning once why the Moon is moving away, I think it's to do with some orbital dynamics such as tides, but I'm hazy. Hopefully someone else can help you on that part.
 
Thanks Wallace.
 
I had a search around the net and found some info confirming what you said Wallace, it is tides, thanks for the clue.
John
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
713
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
10K