Hydrino and Inverse Quantum States

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of Hydrinos and "Inverse Quantum States," exploring the validity and implications of Mills's theories, particularly in relation to claims of a prototype power system generating significant thermal power. The scope includes theoretical considerations and the evaluation of experimental claims.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Mills's theories and their recent claims about a prototype power system generating 50,000 watts of thermal power, suggesting the need for independent verification before acceptance.
  • Others express skepticism, labeling the theories as "high purity crackpottery," indicating a strong critical stance towards the validity of the claims.
  • A participant notes the importance of verified evidence for claims that can be tested, implying that without such evidence, the discussion may not be productive.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus; there are competing views regarding the legitimacy of Mills's theories and the claims made about the prototype power system.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of verified evidence for the claims made by Mills and the dependence on independent analysis for assessing the validity of the proposed theories.

JohnSimpson
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Hydrino and "Inverse Quantum States"

Stumbled upon this recently.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrino

Is there a general consensus about this? I found reference three (3) to make some interesting arguments, but I'm certainly not qualified to critique this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Mills's theories have been discussed here before.

I see they recently (May 28) claimed to have built "a prototype power system generating 50,000 watts of thermal power on demand." I would wait for independent verification and analysis of this before jumping on their bandwagon.
 


This is generally regarded as high purity crackpottery.
 


I am locking this until we have verified evidence of the claim. Claims that can be tested offer no useful discussion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K