B I am looking for a paper written by Massimo Blasone

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heidi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
Click For Summary
Massimo Blasone's work discusses a logical framework for quantum physics using two fields, one for forward time and another for backward time. This concept relates to the thermo field approach in quantum field theory, which involves a doubling of the degrees of freedom in phase space. A user found a relevant paper by Blasone and posed a question about the implications of a one-way mirror on the back trajectory concerning interference. The discussion highlights that thermo field theory is a formulation of non-equilibrium quantum many-body theory that incorporates quantum interference. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the significance of Blasone's contributions to understanding quantum phenomena.
Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
Hi Pf
I read several years ago an article written by Massimo Blasone. He wrote that quantum physics has a much logical description when it uses two fields one forward time and the other backward or something like that.
I forgot in which paper . Did you read it?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it was in a text about thermo field theory. He took a doubling of the degrees of freedom of the phase space.
thanks.
 
I found it:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9707048.pdf
I had a question about it.
the two currents seem to be on equal footing, so what does happen it there is a one-way mirror on the back trajectory? interferences or not in this model?

Does thermo field theory better explain or predict new results?
 
Last edited:
Thermo field theory is one formulation of non-equilibrium quantum many-body theory. It also takes into account quantum interference.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K