I am probably going to be critizied for this, but

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter modeman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of gravity as a universal force and whether it is the sole force responsible for holding celestial bodies such as planets and stars in place. Participants explore alternative theories and concepts related to gravitational forces and their implications for the universe's structure and behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether gravity is the only force holding the universe together, suggesting there may be other forces at play.
  • Another participant asserts that gravity is indeed the only force maintaining the orbits and positions of celestial objects, emphasizing its attractive nature.
  • A participant references an article claiming the existence of a "Stellar Repulsion Force" that contradicts the traditional understanding of gravity, expressing uncertainty about its validity.
  • Several participants critique the referenced article, describing it as lacking credibility and suggesting that its claims are not scientifically sound.
  • One participant discusses the implications of Newton's laws and the expansion of the universe, arguing that gravity alone cannot account for the universe's behavior.
  • Another participant expresses frustration with the proliferation of unverified theories in online discussions, emphasizing the importance of scientific rigor and moderation in forums.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the role of gravity versus other potential forces in the universe. Multiple competing views are presented, with some defending gravity as the primary force while others suggest alternative explanations.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various scientific principles and theories, including Newton's laws and concepts of gravitational attraction. However, there is a lack of agreement on the interpretation of these principles in the context of the universe's structure and expansion.

  • #31
Danger said:
Yeah... you make good points there (the first two, anyhow).

The first two good points I ever make at PF?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
The following was addressed to SpaceTiger
Crazy8s said:
Go back and re-read your cynical post. You will see about what I refer.
Are you not confusing objective, balanced scepticism with cynicism. From an independent perspective your posts seem considerably more cynical than those of SpaceTiger.
I would also be interested in your evidence for saying Newton and da Vinci were considered crackpots. That runs counter to everything I have read about either man.
 
  • #33
I find it difficult to find anything credible in any portion of the zetatalk website. This is the website founded by a woman who claims to talk to aliens and other subjects beyond even the realm of pseudoscience.
 
  • #34
DrChinese said:
And THAT is why I like PhysicsForums!
And I am especially glad that the same crackpots cannot peddle their wares here.
To be honest i don't know how i came across this site, but i am glad i did. I think i can pretty much say its safe to say that the experts here are very competent in the fields of science that they do post about on here. Please note that i don't post much here i mostly read and i will be starting school and hopefully later i will be able to contribute a bit more to the discussions that do take place on this wonderful site.

physicsforums, does rule :biggrin:
 
  • #35
EL said:
The first two good points I ever make at PF?
Not at all. :biggrin:
I always enjoy reading your posts. Just never mentioned it before.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
950
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K