I can't figure out if this statement is true or false, i said false

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the negation of quantified statements in logic, specifically addressing the statement regarding the occurrences of the letter 'u' in the title of Susanna S. Epp's textbook "Discrete Mathematics with Applications, Third Edition." The conclusion drawn is that the statement is false, as the title contains no occurrences of 'u', thus validating the negation. The participants explore logical implications and the structure of quantified statements, emphasizing the importance of clarity in phrasing such statements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantified statements in logic
  • Familiarity with negation in logical expressions
  • Basic knowledge of logical implications and their structure
  • Awareness of the title and content of "Discrete Mathematics with Applications" by Susanna S. Epp
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of negation in predicate logic
  • Learn about quantified statements and their logical forms
  • Explore examples of logical implications and their truth values
  • Review the content of "Discrete Mathematics with Applications" for practical applications of these concepts
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying discrete mathematics, logic enthusiasts, and educators looking to clarify concepts of quantified statements and negation.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
This chapter is working with negations of Quantified statements.

True or False. All the occurrrences of the letter u in the title of this book are lower case. Justify your answer.

I said false, because they arn't being clear when they say "this" If even 1 book doesn't have a lowercase its false. But what is the method you would go about solving this?

I never took a negation of a non-if then statement. If its if then, its pretty easy:
~(Ax, if P(x) then Q(x)) equivlent too Ex such that P(x) and ~Q(x)
or

Ax in D, Q(x) equivlent Ex in D such that ~Q(x)

Note: A should be upside down, and E should be backwards.

THanks! :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If this problem was in a chapter of your textbook, look at the title of your textbook!
 
It was, the title of my textbook is:

Susanna S. Epp
Discrete Mathematics with applications Third Editition

So is Susanna S. Epp part of the title? I think not, so it has to be false right?
 
Are all unicorns green? In logic this translates to,
For all x, if x is a unicorn, x is green.
or more informally
If there is a unicorn, it is green.

There aren't any unicorns, so the antecedent of that implication is false. So all unicorns are green.

Does this help you?
 
yes I believe so! Since the title of the book has no u's (they don't exist, like the unicorn), So All the occurrrences of the letter u in the title of this book are lower case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K