(i)Show that the magnetic field [latex]\mathbf{B}[/latex] on the axis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field generated by a rotating insulating disc with uniform surface charge density. Participants explore various mathematical approaches to derive the magnetic field on the axis of the disc, including contributions from infinitesimal rings and the behavior of the field as the distance from the disc increases. The conversation also touches on related problems involving a spinning ring and the limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula for the magnetic field on the axis of a circular current loop and outlines the problem involving a rotating disc, indicating they have completed part (i).
  • Another participant suggests that the integral for the magnetic field contribution can be evaluated using a substitution, but does not provide specifics.
  • Several participants express difficulty with the integral involving the term r3 in the numerator, with some considering integration by parts or alternative substitutions.
  • One participant proposes separating the integral into two simpler integrals by rewriting r3 in terms of r and z.
  • Another participant discusses the limit behavior of the magnetic field as z approaches infinity, suggesting the use of binomial expansion to simplify terms.
  • Concerns are raised about potential errors in calculations and whether higher-order terms can be ignored in the limit process.
  • Participants discuss how to approach part (iii) of the problem, which involves calculating the magnetic field for a spinning ring with inner and outer radii, and whether integrating between these limits will yield the correct result.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the implications of their calculations and the relationship between the results for the disc and the ring.
  • Another participant suggests manipulating the expression for the magnetic field to facilitate taking the limit as the inner radius approaches the outer radius.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to solving the integral and the use of binomial expansion, but there is no consensus on the specific calculations or the implications of their results, particularly regarding the limit behavior and the relationship between parts (ii) and (iii).

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in their calculations and the need to carefully consider the limits and higher-order terms in their expansions. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the correct application of mathematical techniques to derive the desired results.

  • #31


Substitute that in your original expression and see. Incidentally you won't get back the original term ( the first expression you wrote) but the modified term for z tending to infinity. This is because you've calculated the field using that condition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


B(z)=\frac{1}{2} \mu_0 \sigma \omega \frac{r^3 dr}{z^3} as b-> a dr->0 though?
 
  • #33


That's what you should get.
 
  • #34


hmmm...surely if dr->0, then B(z)->0 which doesn't make much sense though?
 
  • #35


You should try to work out an expression for the current through this ring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
861
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
792
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K