Ideas for sensors measuring the elbow angle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on innovative methods for measuring the elbow angle using various sensor technologies. Key suggestions include using a potentiometer as a rotary encoder, employing a laser range-finder for distance measurement, and exploring inductance changes in coils wrapped around a rubber cord. The accuracy of these methods can vary, with acceptable error margins between 1 to 6 degrees, depending on the application. Participants emphasize the importance of user comfort and mechanical design in creating a practical solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotary encoders and potentiometers
  • Knowledge of inductance measurement techniques
  • Familiarity with laser range-finding technology
  • Basic principles of mechanical design for wearable sensors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of rotary encoders in wearable technology
  • Learn about inductance measurement methods and their applications
  • Explore the use of laser range-finders in dynamic environments
  • Investigate ergonomic design principles for wearable sensors
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, product designers, and researchers focused on developing wearable technology for motion tracking and rehabilitation applications.

Traista Mihai
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

I'm working for about 2 months to build a system for getting digitally values about the angle of the elbow. The project is designated to create a large usage tool and that's why it's preferably to use mechanical staff that are comfortable for the 'user' and to not look very peculiar. It is not compulsory to get directly the angle because if I get for instance the distance between hand and shoulder it's easy afterwards to transform it in angle. I have some options using mouse encoders but implemented on the body but they look too strange and its too much mechanic.
If you have any suggestions/ideas please type them here, any response is welcome !
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
if I get for instance the distance between hand and shoulder it's easy afterwards to transform it in angle
How? Don't you need to know the length of the forearm and upper arm?

Wrap wire in a coil around a rubber cord, stretch it from the wrist to shoulder - the coils separate as the rubber extends, changing the inductance of the coil. Research how to measure inductance electronically.

You could always just use a laser range-finder... the bottom line is that there are too many variables: could you narrow it down a bit?
 
A potentiometer rotating with the elbow could be used as a rotary encoder, returning a voltage related to angle of angle of rotation.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Welcome to PF;
How? Don't you need to know the length of the forearm and upper arm?

Wrap wire in a coil around a rubber cord, stretch it from the wrist to shoulder - the coils separate as the rubber extends, changing the inductance of the coil. Research how to measure inductance electronically.

You could always just use a laser range-finder... the bottom line is that there are too many variables: could you narrow it down a bit?
When I get the max distance between wrist and shoulder automatically I can calculate the lengths of the forearm and upper arm because there is a constant ration between them (maybe it's the gold ratio)
I don't know how precise is the method with the coil around the rubber cord. Is not possible to make only two 'bracelets' one at the wrist and one at the shoulder ?
The 'user' can tilt downward and upward the arm. The laser range finder is working when I rotate the arm?

Integral said:
A potentiometer rotating with the elbow could be used as a rotary encoder, returning a voltage related to angle of angle of rotation.
This is one of the first options I have, although the arm is a bit too loaded with mechanic things..

Baluncore said:
How accurate does your measurement really need to be?
Maybe 1-6 grades error is acceptable.
 
Traista Mihai said:
When I get the max distance between wrist and shoulder automatically I can calculate the lengths of the forearm and upper arm because there is a constant ratio between them (maybe it's the gold ratio)
Or maybe not.
It's like any other ratio in the human body - varies from individual to individual.
If you plot forearm+upper-arm length vs forearm length, you get a wide scatter.

I don't know how precise is the method with the coil around the rubber cord.
It's used in NZ as a quick way to measure the circumference of tree trunks. It's as accurate as you want it to be.

Is not possible to make only two 'bracelets' one at the wrist and one at the shoulder ?
Or whatever you want - the details of the design are up to you.

The 'user' can tilt downward and upward the arm. The laser range finder is working when I rotate the arm?
Operator aims the device, unless auto-aiming apparatus is included - you could also just use a tape-measure.

Maybe 1-6 grades error is acceptable.
The acceptable uncertainty values is up to you and depend on what you want to use the data for.
 
Consider two mutually perpendicular elliptical coils about the upper arm, fed in quadrature, sine and cosine.
Then a pick-up coil about the wrist like a bangle.
The phase of the signal in the pick-up coil will be proportional to the elbow angle.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
709
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
28K
Replies
20
Views
2K