Ideas for sensors measuring the elbow angle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on developing a system to measure the angle of the elbow using various sensor technologies. Participants explore mechanical and electronic methods for capturing elbow movement, considering user comfort and practicality in design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using mouse encoders adapted for the body but expresses concerns about their mechanical appearance.
  • Another proposes measuring the distance between the hand and shoulder to calculate the elbow angle, questioning the need for forearm and upper arm lengths.
  • A method involving wrapping wire around a rubber cord to measure inductance is mentioned, though its precision is questioned.
  • Using a potentiometer as a rotary encoder to measure elbow rotation is presented as a viable option, despite concerns about mechanical load.
  • Participants discuss the acceptable measurement error, with one suggesting that an error of 1-6 degrees might be acceptable.
  • Another participant raises the variability of body ratios, indicating that the forearm and upper arm lengths can differ significantly among individuals.
  • A more complex idea involves using elliptical coils to detect elbow angle through signal phase changes, which introduces additional technical considerations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the best approach to measure elbow angle, with no consensus on a single method or design. There is ongoing debate about the accuracy and practicality of various proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the precision of different methods and the variability in human anatomy, which may affect the effectiveness of certain designs. There are also unresolved questions about the functionality of proposed sensors in dynamic arm positions.

Traista Mihai
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

I'm working for about 2 months to build a system for getting digitally values about the angle of the elbow. The project is designated to create a large usage tool and that's why it's preferably to use mechanical staff that are comfortable for the 'user' and to not look very peculiar. It is not compulsory to get directly the angle because if I get for instance the distance between hand and shoulder it's easy afterwards to transform it in angle. I have some options using mouse encoders but implemented on the body but they look too strange and its too much mechanic.
If you have any suggestions/ideas please type them here, any response is welcome !
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
if I get for instance the distance between hand and shoulder it's easy afterwards to transform it in angle
How? Don't you need to know the length of the forearm and upper arm?

Wrap wire in a coil around a rubber cord, stretch it from the wrist to shoulder - the coils separate as the rubber extends, changing the inductance of the coil. Research how to measure inductance electronically.

You could always just use a laser range-finder... the bottom line is that there are too many variables: could you narrow it down a bit?
 
A potentiometer rotating with the elbow could be used as a rotary encoder, returning a voltage related to angle of angle of rotation.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Welcome to PF;
How? Don't you need to know the length of the forearm and upper arm?

Wrap wire in a coil around a rubber cord, stretch it from the wrist to shoulder - the coils separate as the rubber extends, changing the inductance of the coil. Research how to measure inductance electronically.

You could always just use a laser range-finder... the bottom line is that there are too many variables: could you narrow it down a bit?
When I get the max distance between wrist and shoulder automatically I can calculate the lengths of the forearm and upper arm because there is a constant ration between them (maybe it's the gold ratio)
I don't know how precise is the method with the coil around the rubber cord. Is not possible to make only two 'bracelets' one at the wrist and one at the shoulder ?
The 'user' can tilt downward and upward the arm. The laser range finder is working when I rotate the arm?

Integral said:
A potentiometer rotating with the elbow could be used as a rotary encoder, returning a voltage related to angle of angle of rotation.
This is one of the first options I have, although the arm is a bit too loaded with mechanic things..

Baluncore said:
How accurate does your measurement really need to be?
Maybe 1-6 grades error is acceptable.
 
Traista Mihai said:
When I get the max distance between wrist and shoulder automatically I can calculate the lengths of the forearm and upper arm because there is a constant ratio between them (maybe it's the gold ratio)
Or maybe not.
It's like any other ratio in the human body - varies from individual to individual.
If you plot forearm+upper-arm length vs forearm length, you get a wide scatter.

I don't know how precise is the method with the coil around the rubber cord.
It's used in NZ as a quick way to measure the circumference of tree trunks. It's as accurate as you want it to be.

Is not possible to make only two 'bracelets' one at the wrist and one at the shoulder ?
Or whatever you want - the details of the design are up to you.

The 'user' can tilt downward and upward the arm. The laser range finder is working when I rotate the arm?
Operator aims the device, unless auto-aiming apparatus is included - you could also just use a tape-measure.

Maybe 1-6 grades error is acceptable.
The acceptable uncertainty values is up to you and depend on what you want to use the data for.
 
Consider two mutually perpendicular elliptical coils about the upper arm, fed in quadrature, sine and cosine.
Then a pick-up coil about the wrist like a bangle.
The phase of the signal in the pick-up coil will be proportional to the elbow angle.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
28K
Replies
20
Views
3K