If a^2 is divisible by 3, then a is divisible by 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heute
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if \( a^2 \) is divisible by 3, then \( a \) must also be divisible by 3. The proof utilizes a contradiction approach, assuming \( a \) is not divisible by 3 and expressing \( a \) in the forms \( 3n-1 \) and \( 3n-2 \). Both cases lead to contradictions, confirming that \( a \) must indeed be divisible by 3. This conclusion is supported by the properties of prime numbers and their factorizations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural numbers and divisibility
  • Familiarity with proof by contradiction
  • Basic knowledge of prime factorization
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of prime numbers and their implications in number theory
  • Learn more about proof techniques, specifically proof by contradiction
  • Explore the concept of modular arithmetic and its applications in divisibility
  • Investigate the relationship between squares of integers and their divisibility properties
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying number theory, educators teaching proof techniques, and anyone interested in the properties of divisibility and prime numbers.

Heute
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assume a is a natural number and that a^2 is divisible by 3 (that is, there exists natural number n so that 3n = a^2)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I thought about doing this one by contradiction. Suppose a is not divisible by 3. Then a/3 can be written as

a/3 = b/c

where b and c are natural numbers with no common factors. From there I square both sides to get

(a^2)/9 = b^2/c^2

My plan was to then show that this implies (a^2)/3 is NOT a natural number, a contradiction, which would imply no such b and c exist. I'm not certain if this is the right angle, however, since I had a hard time justifying that 3(b^2)/c^2 is not a natural number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another way to go about it is to show that the contrapositive is true. You are saying that if a^2 is divisible by 3, then so is a. The contrapositive is that if a is not divisible by 3, then a^2 isn't either. If a is not divisible by 3, how can it be written? Can you think of a way to write any natural number that is not divisible by 3 in a general way?

If you are having a hard time with this, think about how you can write any even number. How about any odd number? Does a similar concept apply to 3?
 
I think I follow you.

Suppose 3 does not divide a. Then a can be written as 3n-1 or 3n-2 for some natural number n.

Case 1: a = 3n-1.
Then a^2 = 9n^2-6n+1 which is not divisible by 3 since (3n^2-2n+1/3) is the sum of two natural numbers and a fraction, which is not a natural number.

Case 2: a = 3n-2.
Then a^2 = 9n^2-12n+4 which is not divisible by three by similar reasoning.

But we know a^2 is divisible by three so we have a contradiction. Therefore, a must also be divisible by 3.
 
That works. It's easier you know 3 is prime and just think about prime factorizations, but that still works.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K