If Σc_nx^n converges does Σc_n·nx^(n-1) converge as well?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter OhMyMarkov
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the series $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^n$ and whether this implies the convergence of the series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n n x^{n-1}$. Participants explore the implications of power series convergence, continuity, and differentiability, with references to analytic functions and the Cauchy Integral Formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for $|x|
  • Others argue that the proof requires careful handling of the terms, particularly regarding the absolute values of coefficients, as negative coefficients could affect convergence.
  • A later reply discusses the relationship between the convergence of the original series and the continuity and differentiability of the function it represents, indicating that the derivative can be expressed in terms of the coefficients of the original series.
  • Some participants mention the use of the Cauchy Integral Formula as a rigorous approach to the problem, while others suggest that standard results from real analysis are sufficient for a proof.
  • There is a suggestion that the series converges uniformly in closed intervals within the radius of convergence, which could lead to further implications about the functions involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of complex analysis versus real analysis techniques for proving the convergence of the derivative series. While some agree on the convergence of both series, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to rigorously establish this result.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for clarity on the assumptions regarding the coefficients $c_n$, particularly their signs, and the implications of uniform convergence on the continuity of the functions involved. The discussion also highlights the dependence on definitions of convergence and analyticity.

OhMyMarkov
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone!

Following my earlier post, I've been trying to prove something that uses the convergence of a power series (which I will reveal should I succeed to complete the proof).

Suppose the series $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for all real $|x|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence. Now, does $\sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

I am reluctant to write the following:
|$\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^{n-1}|$ $<|\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n|$

because $x$ can be bigger than 1.

However, with a simple change of variables $k=n-1$, I obtain the following:
$S=\sum _{k=0} ^{\infty} c_k k x^k$ is a series that converges for:
$|x|<R'=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k k}}=\frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{k}}$ $\cdot \displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k}}=1.R = R$

Hence, $S$ converges...

Is the proof correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

OhMyMarkov said:
Hello Everyone!

Following my earlier post, I've been trying to prove something that uses the convergence of a power series (which I will reveal should I succeed to complete the proof).

Suppose the series $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for all real $|x|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence. Now, does $\sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

I am reluctant to write the following:
|$\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^{n-1}|$ $<|\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n|$

because $x$ can be bigger than 1.

However, with a simple change of variables $k=n-1$, I obtain the following:
$S=\sum _{k=0} ^{\infty} c_k k x^k$ is a series that converges for:
$|x|<R'=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k k}}=\frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{k}}$ $\cdot \displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k}}=1.R = R$

Hence, $S$ converges...

Is the proof correct?
Yes, the proof is correct*[/color]. The two power series always have the same radius of convergence.

*[/color] Edit. ... except that you should have used $|c_k|$ instead of $c_k$ (because otherwise you might not be able to take the $k$th root, if $c_k$ is negative).
 
Last edited:
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

OhMyMarkov said:
Hello Everyone!

Following my earlier post, I've been trying to prove something that uses the convergence of a power series (which I will reveal should I succeed to complete the proof).

Suppose the series $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for all real $|x|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence. Now, does $\sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

I am reluctant to write the following:
|$\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^{n-1}|$ $<|\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n|$

because $x$ can be bigger than 1.

However, with a simple change of variables $k=n-1$, I obtain the following:
$S=\sum _{k=0} ^{\infty} c_k k x^k$ is a series that converges for:
$|x|<R'=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k k}}=\frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{k}}$ $\cdot \displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k}}=1.R = R$

Hence, $S$ converges...

Is the proof correct?

In Your 'earlier post' it has benn demonstrated that if $\displaystyle f(x)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n}\ z^{n}$ converges absolutely for |x|<R, then f(x) is analytic for any |x|<R and its derivative is also analityc for |x|<R, so that f'(x) can be written as... $\displaystyle f^{\ '} (x)= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_{n}\ x^{n-1}$ ... where... $\displaystyle b_{n}= n\ a_{n}$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

To explain what I am trying to prove in these two posts:

If $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for $\forall |x|<R$ to $f(x)$, show that $f(x)$ is continuous (this was these two posts).

@chisigma
My next step is to show that $f$ is differentiable with the derivative function exactly as the one you have written...
 
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

OhMyMarkov said:
To explain what I am trying to prove in these two posts:

If $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for $\forall |x|<R$ to $f(x)$, show that $f(x)$ is continuous (this was these two posts).

@chisigma
My next step is to show that $f$ is differentiable with the derivative function exactly as the one you have written...
Since $\sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} nc_n x^{n-1}$ has the same radius of convergence $R$ as $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$, it must converge (within that radius of convergence) to some function, say $g(x) = \sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} nc_n x^{n-1}.$ In fact, that series converges uniformly in any closed interval contained in $(-R,R)$. But a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous and integrable, and can be integrated term by term. (Those are standard theorems that you should be able to find in any analysis text.) Therefore $\displaystyle\int g(x)\,dx = f(x)$ (plus a constant), from which it follows that $f'(x) = g(x).$
 
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

A 'rigorous' statement of the problem requires the use of the so-called 'Cauchy Integral Formula' , according to which if f(z) is analytic inside and on a simple closed line C and z=a is inside C, then...

$\displaystyle f^{(n)} (a) = \frac{n!}{2\ \pi\ i}\ \oint_{C} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{n+1}}\ dz$ (1)

If f(z) is analytic for z=a, then its Taylor expansion is...

$\displaystyle f(z)= a_{0} + a_{1}\ (z-a) + a_{2}\ (z-a)^{2} + ... = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_{k}\ (z-a)^{k}$ (2)

Now if we integrate (2) and take into account that...

$\displaystyle \oint_{C} \frac{dz}{(z-a)^k} = \begin{cases}0 & \text{if } k \ne 1\\
2\ \pi\ i & \text{if } k=1 \end{cases}$ (3)

... setting n=0 in (1) we obtain...

$\displaystyle a_{k} = \frac{1}{2\ \pi\ i}\ \oint_{C} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{k+1}}\ dz$ (3)

In similar way, writing...

$\displaystyle f^{\ '}(z)= b_{0} + b_{1}\ (z-a) + b_{2}\ (z-a)^{2} + ... = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} b_{k}\ (z-a)^{k}$ (2)

... and setting n=1 in (1) we obtain...

$\displaystyle b_{k} = \frac{k+1}{2\ \pi\ i}\ \oint_{C} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{k+2}}\ dz = (k+1)\ a_{k+1}$ (4)

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

chisigma said:
A 'rigorous' statement of the problem requires the use of the so-called 'Cauchy Integral Formula' , according to which if f(z) is analytic inside and on a simple closed line C and z=a is inside C, then...

$\displaystyle f^{(n)} (a) = \frac{n!}{2\ \pi\ i}\ \oint_{C} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{n+1}}\ dz$ (1)
It is certainly not necessary to use the heavy machinery of complex analysis to give a rigorous proof of this result about a function of a real variable. Standard results from real analysis (uniform convergence theorems, as in comment #5 above) are all that is needed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K