I'm a private spacefarer in the year 2050. What physics do I need to know?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krunchyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Year
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the knowledge of physics required for private spacefarers in the year 2050, particularly in relation to operating spacecraft around celestial bodies such as Earth, the Moon, and nearby asteroids. The scope includes theoretical understanding, practical application, and the evolution of technology in space travel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that in 2050, the autopilot systems will be advanced enough that minimal physics knowledge will be necessary for spacefarers.
  • Another participant references a fictional universe where minimal skills are required for space travel, implying a similar future scenario.
  • A participant argues that understanding the physics of gravity may be as essential for spacefarers as understanding lift is for pilots, although they question the necessity of deep knowledge.
  • There is a suggestion that the need for understanding basic physics may diminish over time, similar to how knowledge of internal combustion engines is less relevant for users of self-driving cars.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of understanding Newton's laws for activities like zero gravity walks.
  • A historical analogy is made about the past necessity of map reading for long car journeys, suggesting that future space travel may similarly evolve in terms of required knowledge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of physics knowledge for future spacefarers. While some argue that advanced technology will reduce the need for such knowledge, others maintain that a fundamental understanding of physics will still be important for certain activities.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying assumptions about technological advancements and their impact on the knowledge required for space travel. There are unresolved questions regarding the extent to which understanding physics will remain relevant in the context of advanced autopilot systems.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the future of space travel, technology enthusiasts, and those curious about the intersection of physics and practical applications in aerospace may find this discussion relevant.

Krunchyman
Messages
35
Reaction score
15
It's in the year 2050 and private spacecraft are as cheap and plentiful as Cessna Skyhawks were 40 years ago.

I'm a well-endowed spacefarer looking to get my own spacecraft and license; what physics am I going to need to know to operate my craft around celestial objects, e.g. the earth, moon and nearby asteroids?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Krunchyman said:
It's in the year 2050 and private spacecraft are as cheap and plentiful as Cessna Skyhawks were 40 years ago.

I'm a well-endowed spacefarer looking to get my own spacecraft and license; what physics am I going to need to know to operate my craft around celestial objects, e.g. the earth, moon and nearby asteroids?
None. By that time, the autopilot will likely be smarter than you are.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b, ISamson, berkeman and 3 others
Yep. In Alan Dean Foster's HUMANX 'verse people like Flinx can travel among the stars without more than minimal skills and a good autopilot.
 
Last edited:
phinds said:
None. By that time, the autopilot will likely be smarter than you are.
I agree.

I imagine that'd you'd have to know as much about the physics of gravity as a pilot would have to know the physics of lift (which is probably none.)
 
newjerseyrunner said:
I agree.

I imagine that'd you'd have to know as much about the physics of gravity as a pilot would have to know the physics of lift (which is probably none.)

Best to understand lift before flying airplanes.
 
stefan r said:
Best to understand lift before flying airplanes.
I suspect that saying that in 2050 will be like saying today that you need to understand internal combustion engines in order to ride in a self-driving car.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b
If you plan on going on a zero g walk, you'd better at least understand Newton's laws.
 
People used to need to be able to read a map if they were going very far in a car.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
925
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K