MHB Im back with change subject of formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter fordy2707
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rearranging the formula for frequency, specifically how to make L the subject of the equation. The user initially makes a mistake in squaring the term 2π and misinterprets the rearrangement process. Correct steps involve applying basic operations consistently across the equation to isolate L. The final correct formula for L is derived as L = 1/((2π)²f²C). The user expresses satisfaction with the guidance received and plans to incorporate the advice into their learning.
fordy2707
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
so I've been taught basic rearranging of formula which I've found easy now I am given questions which are obviously a lot harder and I've entered the mind black hole if you could point me in the right direction with this where I go wrong

make L the subject

$f=\frac{1}{2\pi}$ $\sqrt{\frac{1}{LC}}$

=${f}^{2}=\frac{1}{{2\pi}^{2}}\frac{1}{LC}$

=${f}^{2}=\frac{1}{{2\pi}^{2}LC}$

above I may have already gone wrong but in my head its ok,but here on I am quite unsure if I am allowed to move the formula as I have

=${2\pi}^{2}C{f}^{2}=\frac{1}{L}$ ?? is that correct ?

then I am at a total loss as what to do with that fraction left over in my guess I am wanting make a new fraction and throw the 1 under the rest to make

L=$\frac{{2\pi}^{2}C{F}^{2}}{1}$ but this is just guess territory now as I've not been shown this type of question
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
fordy2707 said:
so I've been taught basic rearranging of formula which I've found easy now I am given questions which are obviously a lot harder and I've entered the mind black hole if you could point me in the right direction with this where I go wrong

make L the subject

$f=\frac{1}{2\pi}$ $\sqrt{\frac{1}{LC}}$

=${f}^{2}=\frac{1}{{2\pi}^{2}}\frac{1}{LC}$

=${f}^{2}=\frac{1}{{2\pi}^{2}LC}$

above I may have already gone wrong but in my head its ok,but here on I am quite unsure if I am allowed to move the formula as I have

=${2\pi}^{2}C{f}^{2}=\frac{1}{L}$ ?? is that correct ?

then I am at a total loss as what to do with that fraction left over in my guess I am wanting make a new fraction and throw the 1 under the rest to make

L=$\frac{{2\pi}^{2}C{F}^{2}}{1}$ but this is just guess territory now as I've not been shown this type of question
There are 2 mistakes ( one is because of latex)
There are
1) ${f}^{2}=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}LC}$ you should put $2\pi$ in () and not in $\{\}$ because $2\pi$ should get squared
2) $L=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}C{f}^{2}}$
 
I see, so i treated $2\pi$ as 1 value where its actually 2 different values to be multiplied together .

thanks for your help,im happy with how close I got.i will write your advice into my learning material and should be able to do a sum like that on my own next time
 
The "trick" is, when in doubt, to apply basic operations to the left and to the right of the equal sign.
That is, multiply left and right by the same expression:

$$f^2=\frac 1{(2\pi)^2LC} \\
\Rightarrow f^2 \cdot (2\pi)^2C =\frac 1{(2\pi)^2LC} \cdot (2\pi)^2C$$

After that we can simplify the fraction by canceling common factors:
$$\Rightarrow f^2 \cdot (2\pi)^2C =\frac 1{\cancel{(2\pi)^2}L\cancel C} \cdot \cancel{(2\pi)^2}\cancel C \\
\Rightarrow(2\pi)^2f^2C =\frac 1{L}$$

Now we take the inverse $\frac 1 x$ left and right, to get:
$$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2f^2C} = L \\
\Rightarrow L = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2f^2C}
$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top