Importance of other Elementary Particles?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of various elementary particles, particularly muons, taus, neutrinos, and other baryons and mesons, in the context of physics and their relevance to everyday life. Participants explore their roles in fundamental processes and theories, as well as their importance in the broader framework of particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the importance of muons, taus, and neutrinos, noting a lack of understanding beyond their roles in special relativity and beta decay.
  • Another participant suggests that the relevance of these particles is primarily of interest to physicists and astronomers, as ordinary chemistry and biology can be explained with protons, neutrons, and electrons.
  • It is noted that neutrinos are involved in beta decay and are produced in nuclear fusion, contributing to solar energy, although their everyday relevance is considered low.
  • Muons are highlighted for their role in validating Einstein's theory of special relativity, particularly through their detection despite rapid decay when traveling at high speeds.
  • A participant expresses curiosity about the potential applications or significance of taus, questioning their use in any known experiments or theories.
  • There is a suggestion that a complete model of particle physics may eventually clarify the importance of these particles, as the current standard model is seen as incomplete.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the importance of various elementary particles, with some arguing that their relevance is minimal outside of specialized fields, while others suggest they play crucial roles in fundamental physics. No consensus is reached regarding their significance in everyday life.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the relevance of elementary particles, with some participants emphasizing their theoretical importance versus practical implications. The incomplete nature of the standard model is acknowledged, highlighting limitations in current understanding.

um0123
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
Another question that i am not even qualified to ask:

So i know that all the quarks have a job creating mesons and baryons. And i know the electron is a lepton with a very important job with the structure of an atom. But what is the importance of the muon, the tao, and all three nutrinoes? I've never read that much about them, except when i was learning special relativity and heard about the muon experiment. Furthermore, what's the importance of all the other baryons and mesons besides the proton and nuetron. I haven't really read anything about them either.

Im not doubting they have importance, I am just asking where they are important.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Importance is a subjective question. These other particles are there. For ordinary chemistry and biology, it is sufficient to consider only protons, neutrons, and electrons. Neutrinoes appear in beta decay. Everything else is of interest only to physicists and astronomers.
 
well, what i mean by important is what do we know about them that effects us? atoms are what all matter is made up of, so protons, nuetrons, and electrons are important. But what does the other particles do?
 
As said, neutrinos are involved in beta decay and they are a byproduct of nuclear fusion, so they contribute to the origin of solar energy.

The existence of three families of quarks & leptons may have contributed to matter-antimatter imbalance, and that explains why we're here in the first place. Their relevance to our everyday activities is probably very low.
 
I guess you could say muons are important in that they help validate einstein's theory of special relativity. They are created in our upper atmosphere and decay very quickly, so quick in fact, that at traveling 99% the speed of light, should decay before they reach the Earth's surface. Yet they are still detected. The only way we can currently explain this is with SR's time dilation equation. (The faster an object moves, the slower time ticks for that object).
 
RJVoss said:
I guess you could say muons are important in that they help validate einstein's theory of special relativity. They are created in our upper atmosphere and decay very quickly, so quick in fact, that at traveling 99% the speed of light, should decay before they reach the Earth's surface. Yet they are still detected. The only way we can currently explain this is with SR's time dilation equation. (The faster an object moves, the slower time ticks for that object).

yea, i meantioned that in my OP, have we used taus in anything?
 
Maybe we'll really understand their importance if we ever get a complete model of particle physics. Right now the standard model is a hodge podge of components which in aggregate work pretty well but is clearly incomplete.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K