In science proving something by making it linear is a common?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lonerider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of linearity in scientific equations, specifically examining whether the equation y=a*log(x)+b can be considered linear. Participants explore the implications of transforming variables and the use of linear approximations in scientific analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the equation y=a*log(x)+b does not represent a linear function of x.
  • Another suggests that if X=log(x), then y=aX+b is linear, indicating a possible misunderstanding of the original equation's form.
  • A different participant introduces the idea of linear approximations, explaining that scientists often use them to simplify complex problems, particularly through Taylor expansions.
  • There is a mention of historical graphing tools, such as semi-log and log-log graph paper, which facilitate the representation of data that may not appear linear in standard form.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the original equation can be considered linear, with some supporting the idea of linear transformations while others contest it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the classification of the equation as linear.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical transformations and approximations, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying assumptions about linearity and the conditions under which these transformations apply.

lonerider
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In science proving something by making it linear is a cmmon approach.

For instance you can write some laws on this form.

y=a*log(x)+b

But there lies my problem, because I cannot see how this should represent a linear line. So please does this represent a line? ANd if yes how come?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That does not represent a linear function of x.
 
Perhaps a is of the form 1/(n log x)...>.<"
 
If you let X= log(x), then y= aX+ b is certainly linear. I imagine that is what you are thinking of. If you have data that does not appear to fall on a straight line when you plot (x,y), plotting (X, y) with X= log(x) may help. Sometimes plotting (log(x), log(y)) will help.

Stationery stores used to sell "semi-log graph paper" and "log-log graph paper" that already had one or both axes marked in term of the logarithm so that the conversion was automatic.
 
Are you thinking of a linear approximation? Scientists and engineers use frequently use a linear approximation to make a problem more amenable to analysis.

In general, one makes a linear approximation to some function about some central point as the first-order Taylor expansion of the function at that point. For a one-dimensional function [itex]y(x)[/itex], the linear approximation for [itex]x\approx x_0[/itex] is

[tex]y(x) \approx y(x_0) + (x-x_0)\left.\frac{dy}{dx}\right|_{x=x_0}[/tex]

For your simple example, [itex]y=a\log x + b[/itex], the linear approximation for [itex]x\approx x_0[/itex] is

[tex]y(x) \approx a \log x_0 + b + a\frac {x-x_0}{x_0} = \frac a {x_0} x + a(\log x_0-1) + b[/tex]

Linearizing around [itex]x_0=1[/itex] yields a very simple result:

[tex]y(x) \approx a (x-1) + b[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K