Induced drag of ground effect-vehicle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating induced drag for a model ground effect vehicle that operates close to a flat surface, where airflow under the wing is considered negligible. Participants question the existence of induced drag when there is no airflow around the wing tips, suggesting that the situation resembles a static object in a moving fluid. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear method to calculate drag in this unique scenario, particularly for a wing shape that mimics a bump on the surface. The analysis is focused solely on induced drag, excluding considerations of stability or other aerodynamic factors. The complexities of drag calculation in ground effect conditions remain a key point of inquiry.
Jurgen M
Model ground effect-vehicle shape like on picture fly above flat surface like floor sports hall or ice, wing end plates and trailing edge is so close to the ground(1mm) we can assume airlfow under the wing is zero and has stagnation pressure("100% ground effect").
How to calculate induced drag?

(Dont debate about stability,tail/rudder will fix this.I want analyze induced drag only for wing)
Untitledju.png


Here is some models
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jurgen M said:
How to calculate induced drag?
If there is no flow around the tip of the wing, then how can there be an induced drag ?
 
How would you calculate the drag of a bump, of the same shape and size, on the same flat surface, which has actually no air flow under it? An object moving in a static fluid is the same as a static object within a moving fluid.
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Back
Top