Inequality Problem: $(a_1+1)(a_2+1)...(a_n+1)\geq2^n$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter melese
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around proving the inequality \((a_1+1)(a_2+1)\cdots(a_n+1)\geq2^n\) for positive real numbers \(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n\) under the condition that their product equals 1. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and various approaches to the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the problem and states the goal of proving the inequality under the given condition.
  • Another participant provides a solution using combinatorial arguments and properties of the function \(f(x) = x + \frac{1}{x}\), concluding that equality holds when all \(a_j = 1\).
  • A different participant suggests an alternative approach using the AM-GM inequality, indicating that the product \((a_1+1)(a_2+1)\cdots(a_n+1)\) achieves its minimum when all \(a_i\) are equal, leading to the same conclusion.
  • Another approach is introduced involving the convexity of the function \(f(x) = \ln(1 + e^x)\) and the application of Jensen's Inequality to support the argument.
  • One participant asserts a proof using the AM-GM inequality directly, stating that each term \(a_i + 1\) is greater than or equal to \(2\sqrt{a_i \cdot 1}\), leading to the desired inequality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches to the problem, but there is no consensus on a single method or resolution of the proof. Different perspectives and techniques are explored without agreement on the superiority of one over the others.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments rely on specific properties of functions or inequalities that may not be universally accepted without additional justification. The discussion contains various assumptions about the equality conditions and the implications of the AM-GM inequality.

melese
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Here's a nice problem.
Suppose $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$ are positive real numbers satisfying \(a_1\cdot a_2\cdots a_n=1\). Show that $(a_1+1)(a_2+1)\cdots(a_n+1)\geq2^n$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let $I_n:=\{1,\ldots,n\}$. Then $$\prod_{j=1}^n(1+a_j)=\sum_{J\subset I_n}\prod_{j\in J}a_j=\sum_{j\in J}\left(\prod_{j\in J}a_j\right)^{-1}$$ so $2\prod_{j=1}^n(1+a_j)=\sum_{J\subset I_n}f\left(\prod_{j\in J}a_j\right)$, where $f(x)=x+\frac 1x$. Since $f(x)-2=\frac{x^2+1-2x}x=\frac{(x-1)^2}x\geq 0$, we have $$2\prod_{j=1}^n(1+a_j)\geq \sum_{J\subset I_n}2=2\cdot 2^n$$ so $\prod_{j=1}^n(1+a_j)\geq 2^n$. We notice that we have equality if and only if for all $J\subset I_n$ we have $\prod_{j\in J}a_j=1$ i.e. for all $j\in I_n$, $a_j=1$.
 
Here's another solution.

In general, if we consider the positive number pairs $(t,s)$ and $(\sqrt {ts},\sqrt {ts})$, we find that \[ts=\sqrt {ts}\sqrt {ts}\], but by the AM-GM inequality \[(\sqrt {ts}+1)(\sqrt {ts}+1)=(\sqrt {ts}+1)^2=ts+2\sqrt {ts}+1\leq ts+2\frac{t+s}{2}+1=(t+1)(s+1)\] with equality only when $t=s$. This means that the product $(t+1)(s+1)$ is minimal exactly when $t=s$ to begin with.

If not all the $a_i$ are equal, then WLOG $a_1\neq a_2$. But then, \[(a_1+1)\cdot(a_2+1)\cdots(a_n+1)\geq(\sqrt{a_1a_2}+1)(\sqrt{a_1a_2}+1)\cdots(a_n+1),\] which means that minimum value of $(a_1+1)\cdot(a_2+1)\cdots(a_n+1)$ is obtained only if we assume all the $a_i$ are equal. The assumption $a_1\cdot a_2\cdots a_n=1$ gives $a_1=a_2=...=a_n=1$.

So it's true that $(a_1+1)\cdot(a_2+1)\cdots(a_n+1)\geq(1+1)(1+1) \cdots(1+1)=2^n$.
 
Another approach:

Consider the function f(x) = ln(1 + e^x). Show that the second derivative is positive, hence f is convex. Then apply Jensen's Inequality.
 
since for i=1,2,3,-----n

$a_i>0$

$a_i+1\geq 2\sqrt {a_i\times1}$

$\therefore (a_1+1)(a_2+1)--------(a_n+1)\geq 2^n(\sqrt{a_1a_2a_3------a_n}=2^n$

and the proof is done
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K