Infinite series sum of (-1)^n/lnx

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series sum from 2 to infinity of (-1)^n/ln(n) is determined to be conditionally convergent using the Alternating Series Test. The discussion highlights the challenges of applying the ratio and root tests, as well as the need for comparison tests to establish absolute convergence. It is established that since ln(n) is an increasing function, the terms of the series decrease in magnitude, which is crucial for the convergence analysis. The conclusion emphasizes the necessity of additional tests, such as the integral test or comparison test, to definitively determine absolute convergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Alternating Series Test
  • Familiarity with convergence tests (ratio test, root test, comparison test)
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Integral Test for convergence of series
  • Learn about the Comparison Test for series convergence
  • Explore the properties of logarithmic functions in calculus
  • Review the conditions for absolute convergence versus conditional convergence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying series convergence, particularly in calculus or analysis courses.

JoeTrumpet
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find if the series is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent.

The sum from two to infinity of (-1)^n/lnx.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to integrate 1/lnx, so that failed. The ratio and root test don't seem to simplify matters any further. I wasn't sure of anyway I could use the comparison test or limit ratio test. I used Alternate Series Test so I at least know that it's convergent, but I don't know if it's conditionally convergent or absolutely convergent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try thinking some more about comparision tests.
 
That is an alternating series (that's crucial) and ln(x) is an increasing function. What does that tell you?
 
Hm, would it be reasonable to say that because n > ln(n) for all n from 2 to infinity, 1/ln(n) > 1/x, which is divergent, thus making 1/ln(n) divergent and the sum from 2 to infinity of ((-1)^n)/ln(n) conditionally convergent? It didn't really occur to me to compare a transcendental function to an algebraic function (if it's even legal, anyway). Thanks for the help (assuming my solution was okay)!
 
Last edited:
Yes, the "alternating series" test says simply that if terms of \sum a_n are alternating in sign and |an| is decreasing, then the series converges. In fact, it is easy to see that, given any N, the entire sum lies between the partial sum up to N and the partial sum up to N+1.
 
But would that test be useful if you're distinguishing between whether something is absolutely convergent or conditionally convergent?
 
It will possibly tell you if it's conditionally convergent. You'll need another test to answer whether is absolutely convergent or not. Something like the integral test or a comparison test.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K