- #1

Arman777

Gold Member

- 2,165

- 185

2-Can Entrophy always increases statement imply information lost ?

3-If it implies how its lost ?

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter Arman777
- Start date

- #1

Arman777

Gold Member

- 2,165

- 185

2-Can Entrophy always increases statement imply information lost ?

3-If it implies how its lost ?

- #2

Khashishi

Science Advisor

- 2,815

- 493

1. Entropy and information are basically opposites. Entropy tells you how many quantum states are consistent with the information you have. If you have more information about the state, then there are fewer states that match the description, so the entropy is less.

2. Yes.

3. When two particles interact, they trade some energy and momentum. The amount of energy/momentum transfer is in superposition. Somehow, the wavefunction collapses, and the amount of transfer takes on some random value. So, if we initially knew the energy/momentum of each particle before the interaction, afterwards we only know the total. So some information was lost. It's not clear how this wavefunction collapse occurs.

2. Yes.

3. When two particles interact, they trade some energy and momentum. The amount of energy/momentum transfer is in superposition. Somehow, the wavefunction collapses, and the amount of transfer takes on some random value. So, if we initially knew the energy/momentum of each particle before the interaction, afterwards we only know the total. So some information was lost. It's not clear how this wavefunction collapse occurs.

Last edited by a moderator:

- #3

Arman777

Gold Member

- 2,165

- 185

1. Entropy and information are basically opposites. Entropy tells you how many quantum states are consistent with the information you have. If you have more information about the state, then there are fewer states that match the description, so the entropy is less.

2. Yes.

3. When two particles interact, they trade some energy and momentum. The amount of energy/momentum transfer is in superposition. Somehow, the wavefunction collapses, and the amount of transfer takes on some random value. So, if we initially knew the energy/momentum of each particle before the interaction, afterwards we only know the total. So some information was lost. It's not clear how this wavefunction collapse occurs.

I understand thanks,

Like Conservation of Information ?

Last edited by a moderator:

- #4

Arman777

Gold Member

- 2,165

- 185

"CPT seems to imply it. You can reverse the system evolution by applying charge, parity and time conjugation, so the information about the past must be contained in the present state. That implies conservation of information by the evolution.

This may not be the answer you wanted, because it does not imply unitarity, but it is the only relationship between symmetry and information conservation that I can think of. Unitarity seems to be a very fundamental assumption though, and there is not much more fundamental mathematical structure you could use to argue about its necessity." (A.O.Tell,Physics Stack Exchange,https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...associated-to-the-conservation-of-information)

- #5

Khashishi

Science Advisor

- 2,815

- 493

But, wavefunction collapse is not a unitary transformation.

- #6

Arman777

Gold Member

- 2,165

- 185

I don't know much things about wavefunction actually I am freshman at physics :)But, wavefunction collapse is not a unitary transformation.

So it doesn't conserved.

Like energy,momentum etc is even not conserved in macroscopic states,like galaxy clusters scale etc.So It make sense to me that its not conserved.Maybe we can say the information about the system is lost during the time.It never disappeares but it just turns something that we can't describe the full system after a period of time using previous information

- #7

Grinkle

Gold Member

- 757

- 217

https://profmattstrassler.com/artic...ack-hole-information-paradox-an-introduction/

- #8

Jilang

- 1,116

- 72

"CPT seems to imply it. You can reverse the system evolution by applying charge, parity and time conjugation, so the information about the past must be contained in the present state. That implies conservation of information by the evolution.

/QUOTE]

Sure, that's fine if it doesn't interact with anything.

- #9

Arman777

Gold Member

- 2,165

- 185

I ll look when I can.Thanks :)

https://profmattstrassler.com/artic...ack-hole-information-paradox-an-introduction/

- #10

Arman777

Gold Member

- 2,165

- 185

Makes sense...

- #11

Arman777

Gold Member

- 2,165

- 185

Share:

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 615

- Replies
- 39

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 26

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 54

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 442

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 352

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 233

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 619

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 439

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 550